The Real Robert F. Kennedy (Pt. 4) - Civil Rights (Continued)
Originally recorded 09/03/24 as the outro for Episode 66 – Jeff Hays: The Real RFK Jr.
Podcast Version: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6
Essay Version: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6
Marxism & Destruction of the Family
When I started writing this essay, I viewed Martin Luther King Jr. as a hero of American history. I thought that this great man improved race relations in America, setting us on the proper course after we’d been led astray.
Yet as I’ve confronted the true, darker history of America over the last several years, I’ve come to recognize that our history books do a phenomenal job of vilifying the heroes and idolizing the villains. I didn’t understand why the economic situation for our black communities could be so atrocious today, if the victories of the civil rights movement were the groundbreaking achievements they’re made out to be.
Then, as synchronicity would have it, while writing this episode, Tucker Carlson interviewed Vince Everett Ellison. What he had to say was challenging for me to hear, but I could not deny the truth in his words. His commentary helped me to understand what’s really been going on with race relations in America over the past sixty years:[i]
Tucker Carlson: “So the civil rights movement, the official civil rights movement, was and is still described as a Christian movement.”
Vince Everett Ellison: “Yeah.”
Carlson: “Was it?”
Ellison: “No. Anything but. You know, it's been a lot of great scholarship done recently. Virgil Walker has done a lot of good scholarship. Ginny NiCarthy has done some good scholarship. And they have, Ginny NiCarthy looked at King’s papers from Stanford; come to find out that King wasn't even a Christian.”
Carlson: “He wasn't a Christian?”
Ellison: “No, they said he didn't believe in the deity of Christ. Didn't believe in the virgin birth. Didn't believe in the resurrection. Didn't believe in hell. You, if you don't believe in those things, you can't be a Christian.”
Carlson: “No. That's true.”
Ellison: “So when you look in this monument inside of D.C., do you notice that ‘Reverend’ is not on it?”
Carlson: “No, I didn't know that.”
Ellison: “There are no - there's nothing about God on that monument. Nothing. This is not a mistake. This is a confession. They knew exactly who they were. And our Bible tells us that a tree is known… How do you know a false prophet? A tree is known by the fruit it bears.”
Carlson: “That's right.”
Ellison: “You will not get good fruit from a bad tree. Or bad fruit from a good tree. Each tree in its fruit will be after its own kind. So, when you look at the black community and the condition that is in. If it's bad fruit. The tree had to be bad.”
Carlson: “That's right.”
Ellison: “And if it's bad fruit, it's a false prophet. It's binary. And when you look at where we were between 1940 and 1960. The black community cut its poverty rate from 80% to about 35% in 20 years, the greatest reduction of poverty in the history of the world. And then after the civil rights movement, we flatlined.
Why? We turned from God to government. And Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement led us on that. And we know how King was all tied up with the Communists. Man, Stanley Levinson was the number one communist in America. Bayard Rustin had been a Communist in his youth. The guy that ran the SCLC, his name was Jack O’Dell, Hunter Pitts O’Dell, he was a Communist. King's lawyer, Clarence Jones, was a Communist. Clarence Jones and Stanley Levinson say they wrote the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. They were both Communists.
And when you look at the ‘I Have a Dream’ speech. It's amazing when you dissect it and deconstruct it, because when King says five times in that speech, you know. The first thing he said was, ‘100 years after the Emancipation Proclamation, the Negro is still not free.’ That is a lie. I was born free. My freedom is a gift from God. It is an unalienable right. According to John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. It is irrevocable, nontransferable and unsellable.
Now, King says five times in that speech that we were not free. Then at the end he has that great refrain that on some certain day, we will be ‘Free at last. Free at last. Thank God Almighty, we're free at last.’ Still telling us we're not free. And we make our children recite that speech. Every year on his birthday, saying that they are not free, that they come to government for the unalienable right to freedom.
You don't ask government for your freedom. You defy government to come and try to take it from you. What did our founding fathers say when King George said, ‘I'm your sovereign?’ No, you're not. I'm going to show you. And he said, ‘I'm not just going to come in and kill you guys. I'm going to bring you back to Great Britain. I'm going to choke you till you're almost dead. Then I'm going to castrate you. Then I'm going to cut you open, let you see your guts before you die, and then after you're dead, I'm going to cut off your limbs and sell those parts throughout the British Empire.’
And guess what the founding fathers said? In the Declaration they said, ‘We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.’ Put their names on it. Sent it to him and said, ‘Bring it.’ And whooped his ass.
Free men, and then they walked around with their chest stuck out. ‘Yeah, we did it.’ And King is wandering around. King would have asked King George, he’d have said, ‘Well, boss, can we be free?’ ‘No!’ ‘Well, okay then. We'll just march until you decide to give it to us.’
You don't give us our freedom, we earn it. It’s ours. Come and try to take it.
And this is the mindset that they placed into America, black America first, but now America. And look at the results of it. We're at the bottom of every socio-economic statistic in America. And there's a revolution now happening here in America. They’re turning against the Democratic Party. They're turning away from it. Because they're seeing that it's not working.
Joe Biden walking around, ‘MAGA crowd going to put you back in the busses! MAGA crowd going to put you back in the cotton field!’ And black folks are looking at him like, ‘What?’ You didn’t see him at Morehouse College?”
Carlson: “Yeah, just the other day.”
Ellison: “This is one of the funniest things I ever saw in my life.”
Carlson: “What did he say?”
Ellison: “These are young black men, twenty-one, twenty-two years old. He’s up there talking, ‘They’re going to put you in the back of the buses! They want you to eat hamburgers in the back of the restaurant!’ And they’re looking at him like (laughs)….”
Ellison: “He [King] was more like Rasputin than he was Jesus Christ. He became an indispensable person in government for a very long time because they put so much behind him. I read this great book. I can't think of the name of it now. They talked about the civil rights movement was more about the Cold War than it was about anything else. Because the Russians were using the propaganda of how they were, how America treated black people.”
Carlson: “Yes.”
Ellison: “To have African nations and Asian nations come to Communism.”
Carlson: “Yes. That's true.”
Ellison: “You’re our Comrades. You're our brothers.”
Carlson: “That's right.”
Ellison: “They had W.E.B. Du Bois come to China.”
Carlson: “Yes.”
Ellison: “Gave him all kinds of awards and everything. Stalin had these guys. Malcolm X would go over there and talk, so they would use it as a propaganda piece. And they said, ‘We have to take care of this.’ So, King was their front man in this effort. They didn't know King was compromised by the Communists until right before the March on Washington. And that's when Bobby Kennedy told him – first Dick DeLoach told him, ‘Get these Communists out.’”
Carlson: “Number two guy at the FBI.”
Ellison: “Yeah, he wouldn't do it. Then Bobby Kennedy told him, ‘Man, you got to get these guys out.’ He wouldn't do it. And then right before the March on Washington, the big seven, big six, whatever that came to the White House, and Bobby Kennedy gave John Kennedy a nod.
And John Kennedy told King, ‘Come out to the Rose Garden, I want to talk to you.’ He didn't even want it to be bugged in the Oval Office because he was going to share top secret information with him. And he said, ‘I know you know you're under surveillance.’ That's lawyer talk for saying, ‘You're under surveillance.’”
Carlson: “Yeah.”
Ellison: “’You have 3 or 4 guys in your organization who are Communists. They have to go.’ And he called their names. Bayard Rustin. Jack O’Dell. Stanley Levinson. He said, ‘These guys are Communists, and they have to go.’ Then King tried to deny it. And he [JFK] said, ‘Look, do you think I pulled these guys names out of a hat? I'm the President of the United States of American and I know their names.’
And he [JFK] brought up this guy in Great Britain that got caught in some type of sex scandal. I forget his name. But he [JFK] said, ‘You know about this?’ He [King] said, ‘Yes.’ He [JFK] said, ‘Well, he lost his government behind that.’ He said, ‘I could do the same thing. If you go down, I go down. You’ve got to get rid of these guys because I'm affiliated with you.’
They had, they had invested a lot in him. So, King said he would do it. Well, J. Edgar Hoover, of course, didn't believe it. And he heard about this group of Communists that were going to be meeting down in Dorchester, Georgia, and he set up some cameras to see who was going to show up. And lo and behold, Martin Luther King, Martin Luther King Junior showed up in this nest of spies after this long conversation with the President.
And he [Hoover] brought these, these pictures back to Bobby Kennedy and said, ‘I thought he said he was going to get rid of these guys and he was going to cut them loose.’ And that's when Bobby Kennedy signed to put the wiretaps on him. He said, ‘Because…’ And it was more to protect him. Because they thought he was going to be blackmailed and that he was going to be infiltrated and dah, dah, dah, dah, dah.
And, and so they watched him. And as you know, none of this stuff really got out until - and it's funny how it got out. The night of the Joe Frazier - Muhammad Ali fight, 1971. Everybody's watching this fight, right? So, this group of weirdo Communists decided that they were going to burglarize an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania. They burglarized the FBI office. And guess what they found? According to the Media Papers.”
Carlson: “Yes.”
Ellison: “Brought them out and gave them to the Washington Post and The New York Times. And that's where all the stuff about King came out. It wasn't J. Edgar Hoover, it wasn't the FBI, it wasn't the Conservatives. It was the Liberals that put it out there. And when people started reading it, they said, ‘Oh my God.’ Hoover had kept King’s stuff secret. All of it. Nobody knew it.”
Carlson: “The sex stuff?”
Ellison: “Yeah, the sex stuff. And then when it got out, the people, King's people wanted to have it all destroyed. And that's when the judge said, ‘No, we're going to take it and we're going to seal it for 50 years. And nobody can see it.’ But yeah, these Liberal morons were the ones that broke into the FBI office and stole it and gave it to the press. And that's where and that's how we knew about King's affairs, and his 45 girlfriends and his prostitutes and the orgies. Which the thing that bothers me more about all of it, Tucker, is the prostitutes. The orgies are bad. We ain't got to talk about that. But when you buy flesh, and you say you're a man of God. I mean, that's very, that's very visceral with me.”
Calrson: “Yeah.”
Ellison: “That's visceral, you know. Just so much terrible stuff. But the fact that, you know, they say he plagiarized his PhD. Which means that he was a fake doctor. And then you know, they say that he wasn't a Christian. Which means he was a fake Christian. And he walks around with these Communists. Then, it'd gotten so bad that Dick DeLoach finally told J. Edgar Hoover, he said, ‘You can't talk to him.’ And that's when J. Edgar Hoover then decided to make him an enemy of the state.
And this is when it gets interesting with his assassination. When I read this in Taylor Branch's book Parting the Waters: America in the King Years. And Taylor Branch is a Democrat.”
Carlson: “Yeah.”
Ellison: “He's Bill Clinton's roommate at Yale.”
Carlson: “Yeah.”
Ellison: “So, it's not a Conservative saying this. It's a Democrat, Bill Clinton friend that said this about King. He said that, ‘The FBI designated King an enemy of the state, and there’s only about 5 or 6 people that had ever been, had such designation in the United States of America history. And they said that, ‘With this designation, even if they heard that somebody was coming to assassinate him, they wouldn't warn him.’ And that was a courtesy they would give to Mafia dons. They will not give it to King.
So, they said he's an enemy of the United States of America. This is interesting. That he was so affiliated with these people. They found out that money from Moscow was bankrolling the civil rights movement. He was getting money from Moscow, putting it in his pocket. All of this. That he was, he was, he was deemed an enemy of the United States of America by the federal government…”
Carlson: “Who was Obama in retrospect?”
Ellison: “I think Barack Obama was a part of a worldwide Liberal movement. Eastern, from Western Europe to here, all of them, all of this cabal of weirdos over in Europe that were pushing things at that time, from Merkel, to the guy over in France. Obama was involved in all of it, and all this LGBTQ stuff and all this climate change crap started happening then, and it's all designed for a one world government to try to get, I don't know, the World Health Organization or the UN or somebody to start getting some type of Criminal Court. They can start arresting us for not doing what they want us to do.”
Carlson: “So I mean, it's funny the distance between what you thought something was and then what you later learn that it actually was. And on the LGBTQ plus or whatever we're calling it now, I mean, I was raised in a pretty Liberal area where we were told that was about, you know, a certain percent of the population, I think it was 10% they said was gay by birth. And, you know, leave them alone. Don't bother them. Like, don't be mean to them.
Ellison: “Right. Exactly. Me too. Exactly. Exactly. I agree.”
Carlson: “And that always made sense to me. I had zero interest in bothering people in general, particularly over their sex lives. But now I'm starting to think in my age that it wasn't, that actually wasn't, kind of, what it was about.”
Ellison: “No, no, no. It's, it's a, it’s, it's - they understand what they're doing. You know what Communism is? Number one, it's Atheism. Why? Because they do not compete for power.”
Carlson: “Number one, it's Atheism. I agree with that.”
Ellison: “Number one, they don't compete for power. In America, we say there's a higher level than the Constitution, it's God. There's certain rights that we have that you cannot touch government. That's our whole concept of government, unalienable rights.
We have a Bill of Rights that says, you can't touch these, government. The Communists say no. No such ideology exists. The government controls all. So, God has to be destroyed. We know that much of LGBTQ is in direct conflict with our Bible. Direct conflict. Absolutely…”
Ellison: “Martin Luther King Jr. wants to eat a hamburger down south. Racist white man says no. Martin says, ‘I'll be back.’ This time he brings the federal government. Federal government puts a gun to the guy's head. And says, ‘Either Martin Luther King or your brains are going to be on that lunch counter eating that hamburger.’ Guy lets him eat. Was Martin Luther King Jr. a violent man? Of course he was. He used violence from a third party.”
Carlson: “Yes.”
Ellison: “Civil rights movement wasn't a nonviolent movement. A nonviolent movement would have been changing your neighbor’s heart by your actions. What does that mean? If he's mean to me, I'm good to him. If you won't let me eat a hamburger at your stand, I'll build another restaurant that's better than yours. You eat at mine for free. If you won't let me go to your school, I'll build a better school than yours, and you can send your child to mine for free. You treat me bad. I treat you right. But you're going to treat me like a man. You're going to treat me with respect. I demand that. And this is how you get your respect.
Instead, what did they do? They used the gun. In the book of Corinthians, it says eleven people will not enter the kingdom of heaven. The last one is the extortionist. What's the extortionist? An extortionist is the one that uses violence, threats, coercion to get what they want. And that's what the civil rights movement did. It didn't change the hearts of Americans. It extorted them. It told them, either give us what we want or we're going to blow your brains out. We're going to put you in jail. That is not the Christian way.
And it failed because they used the tool of the devil to get what they wanted, and it continues to fail. We all, we're at the bottom of every socio-economic statistic in America because we will not do what we've always supposed to have done. And that was live in this meritocracy. How did we break into the NFL? We showed we were better. How did we break into the NBA? Showed we were better. We went out there and we competed. Mano a mano. I'm going to beat you straight up.
Tucker, if you make a glass that's better than this one, that will last for 1,000 years, people are not going to care what your color is. They're going to buy it.”
Carlson: “What's the tool of the devil that he used?”
Ellison: “Extortion.”
Carlson: “Yep.”
Ellison: “Extortion. Coercion. You’re going to give me, I'm going to pass a law that says if you don't give me what I want, the federal government is going to put you in jail or kill you. Now, give me what I want. That is not the Christian way. We aren't even supposed to sue each other…”
Ellison: “A lot of people think that the Montgomery bus boycott ended the segregation on the busses. It didn't. It was the NAACP. They had a Supreme Court decision that did it. Martin Luther King's bus boycott just aggravated a lot of people. They didn't do anything.
And then, people don't know this, two years later, the black people [were] sitting in the back of the bus again because of white intimidation. Yes. They went back to the back of the bus voluntarily. In Montgomery, Alabama. They don't talk about that little tidbit of history.
They don't tell people that Rosa Parks was an operative trained at the Highlander Folk School, a Communist training camp in Monteagle, Tennessee. King, Ralph Abernathy, all of them went there. Led by these three Communists, Dombrowski, and Myles Horton and all of them. They keep that part of our history secret. Yeah, there was a communist training camp in Monteagle, Tennessee. They tore it down in the ‘60s because they thought it was a Communist training camp.
And they're the ones that were training all these people how to use nonviolent resistance to cause violence. Cause violence. They went down to Montgomery and Birmingham and said, ‘We're going to poke at Bull Connor until people start getting water hoses and dogs sicked on them. The concept was to cause violence to aggravate you until you strike out at me. It's me coming up in your face and going, ‘Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.’ And then you finally say, ‘Vince, you better leave me alone now.’
I never touch you. But I put my finger in your face, and I messed with you until you just... And then I say, ‘Hey Tucker’s violent!’ You know, and those were their tactics. And they did, and nothing good came out of it because the black people are poorer in Selma and Montgomery than they’ve ever been.”
Carlson: “I've noticed that. No one seems to care.”
Ellison: “They don't care because it was about getting the vote for the Democratic Party. So, they could take it over. There were, there were 5 million, 6 million latent black votes down south, black votes down south that they couldn’t use. And they understood that Stockholm Syndrome was going to take over. And they would vote for the Democratic Party. As a matter of fact, if you read the history of that time, when the election of 1960 was going on, Martin Luther King Jr. and the rest of them put this thing called a blue bomb. It was a, it was a blue piece of paper that they, that they passed to all of the churches in the South. And it was talking about how when Martin Luther King Jr. was locked up in jail, that JFK had given Martin Luther King Jr. a phone call and had talked to his wife, and Richard Nixon did not.
And that was enough to get 80% of the black people to vote for JFK down South during the election of 1960 and beat Nixon, who had supported the 1957 Civil Rights Act and the 1960 Civil Rights Act. That gave them the right to vote anyway. But it was the blue bomb that did it and it was them again leveraging the black preacher who, if you want to talk to an ignorant joker, talk to most black preachers in the United States of America.
Man, these guys. Don't know anything about foreign policy. Don't know anything about government. All they know about [is] how to get money in their hands. For taking black people to the polls to vote for the Democratic Party. And again, if you want -”
Carlson: “Is that still the case? Is that still the case that the get out the vote operation in the South among Democrats is still heavily reliant on black preachers?”
Ellison: “Oh, yeah. You ever heard of ‘Souls to the Polls’?”
Carlson: “No.”
Ellison: “Oh, yeah man, you should look it up. Souls to the Polls is an organization run by, it's funded by George Soros and his people. And they give every Sunday before the first Tuesday in November. These churches will use church buses to put their congregants into this bus and take them to the polls and have them vote.
And this is unspoken, but for every black person that they can get in the bus, they get about ten, fifteen dollars. And in my documentary Will You Go to Hell for Me? I have a picture of Raphael Warnock and John Lewis standing in front of a 'Souls to the Polls bus. They’ve got Souls to the Polls written on it.
So, yeah, everybody can look up Souls to the Polls and see that it is something. Matter of fact, before the election this year, Kamala Harris was out there talking about Souls to the Polls. They were out there rallying it. Yeah. And it's all about the black church.”
Exhibit 59[v]
In his book, The Iron Triangle, Ellison highlights the “accomplishments” of 60+ years of the civil rights movement and one-party control of black America by the Democratic party:[vi]
Health
On Aug. 24, 2014, Fox News reported murder has replaced AIDS as the number one killer of all Black people between the ages of 15 and 34.
Over four hundred thousand Black babies are aborted every year. Between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 Blacks were lynched by the Ku Klux Klan. Today with the help of Black preachers, Black people kill more of their people in three days than the Klan lynched in eighty-six years.
Crime
Over 50 percent of Blacks at any time are either in prison, on probation, or on parole.
Blacks are seven times more likely than other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit a robbery.
Blacks are an estimated thirty-nine times more likely to commit a crime against a White person than vice versa and 136 times more likely to commit a robbery.
Between 1980 and 2003 the incarceration rate tripled from 320,000 to 1,390,000. Blacks are seven times more likely than Whites to go to prison.
Of the top ten most dangerous cities in America all are majority Black.
Poverty
2016 poverty statistics report 22 percent of Black families lived in poverty, the highest in the nation, compared to 19.4 for Hispanics, 8.8 percent White, 10.1 for Asian.
Education
According to Prep Scholar the average 2017 SAT scores among Black students was 941 compared to 1118 for Whites, 1083 for Asians, 962 for American Indians, and 990 for Hispanics.
Colin Powell’s nonprofit America’s Promise reported that only 52 percent of high school students in urban centers graduate. In cities where the Black populace is extremely high, like Detroit, Cleveland, and Indianapolis, the dropout rate ranges from 65 percent to 75 percent.
If a tree is known by the fruit it bears, then this tree is rotten. Is it time to consider that Martin Luther King Jr. was not the man he claimed to be? And if Marxism can be summarized as destruction of the nuclear family and abolition of private property, what evidence might we find of the subversive, Marxist influence in America today?
Abortion & Eugenics
One of the illustrious awards received by Martin Luther King Jr. was the first Margaret Sanger Award in 1966.[vii] Margaret Sanger is the founder of Planned Parenthood, the largest organization of abortion clinics in the country.
MLK Jr. received his award for “his courageous resistance to bigotry and his lifelong dedication to the advancement of social justice and human dignity." King received his award alongside President Johnson, for LBJ’s “vigorous and farsighted leadership in bringing the United States government to enunciate and implement an affirmative, effective population policy at home and abroad."
In a 1939 letter to Clarence Gamble, a founder of consumer-packaged goods giant Procter & Gamble, Sanger wrote the following:[viii]
There is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South…
I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with the white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the Clinic he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results among the colored people. His work in my opinion should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us.
The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population”. What do you think Margaret Sanger could have meant by that?
Here’s some of what MLK Jr. had to say, 27 years later, in his acceptance of the first Margaret Sanger award:[ix]
“[W]e spend paltry sums for population planning, even though its spontaneous growth is an urgent threat to life on our planet…
There is no human circumstance more tragic than the persisting existence of a harmful condition for which a remedy is readily available. Family planning, to relate population to world resources, is possible, practical and necessary. Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess…
During the past half century Negroes have migrated on a massive scale, transplanting millions from rural communities to crammed urban ghettoes. In their migration, as with all migrants, they carried with them the folkways of the countryside into an inhospitable city slum.
The size of family that may have been appropriate and tolerable on a manually cultivated farm was carried over to the jammed streets of the ghetto. In all respects Negroes were atomized, neglected and discriminated against. Yet, the worst omission was the absence of institutions to acclimate them to their new environment. Margaret Sanger, who offered an important institutional remedy, was unfortunately ignored by social and political leaders in this period. In consequence, Negro folkways in family size persisted…
For the Negro, therefore, intelligent guides of family planning are a profoundly important ingredient in his quest for security and a decent life. There are mountainous obstacles still separating Negroes from a normal existence. Yet one element in stabilizing his life would be an understanding of and easy access to the means to develop a family related in size to his community environment and to the income potential he can command.
This is not to suggest that the Negro will solve all his problems through Planned Parenthood. His problems are far more complex, encompassing economic security, education, freedom from discrimination, decent housing and access to culture. Yet if family planning is sensible it can facilitate or at least not be an obstacle to the solution of the many profound problems that plague him.”
In other words, MLK Jr. is instructing black Americans not to have as many kids, now that they live mostly in cities. That they should be concerned about the economic hardship of raising children. That Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood offers a simple solution for black men and women looking to evolve from those “outdated folkways” built on large family sizes.
Today, Planned Parenthoods’ clinics are disproportionately located in minority neighborhoods, with 51% in areas above 125% of the state minority average.[x] Mark Crutcher and Carole Novielli conducted this research on Planned Parenthood’s locations,[xi] and say the location of abortion centers is the modern equivalent of the population control policies against minorities, especially African Americans, that Planned Parenthood has supported since Margaret Sanger founded it.
From Roe v. Wade’s passage in 1967 through June of 2018, the estimated number of cumulative abortions in America have been 59.4 million.[xii] Of these, 20.4 million of the fetuses aborted have been of black Americans. Given that the total black population in 2018 was about 42 million people, the population of black America today would be about 50% larger, if not for abortion.
Perhaps it’s time to consider that the abortion issue is more nuanced than women’s reproductive rights vs. conservative white men who want to control their uteruses? And is it possible Martin Luther King Jr. was knowingly promoting policies that would lead to the destruction of black families?
You might be interested to know that Margaret Sanger was joined on the board of Planned Parenthood by another racist eugenicist obsessed with “population control” – Bill Gates Sr.[xiii] His son, Bill Gates Jr., would have a career whose resume highlights include the Microsoft monopoly and the COVID-19 plandemic. It’s almost enough to make you ask, were Gates Jr.’s decisions during the pandemic focused not on public health, but rather geared towards depopulation?
Kamala Harris has made abortion a cornerstone of the first months of her presidential selection. Harris and the Democratic party elites have used abortion as a rallying cry for women against President Trump, who they claim wants to institute a national abortion ban. This argument is made despite the fact that Trump didn’t institute a national abortion ban in the four years of his first term, and that he has said explicitly:[xiv]
President Donald Trump: “To put it simply, it’s now up to the states. And like Ronald Reagan, I’m a believer in the exceptions, the three exceptions, as you know. Rape, incest and life of the mother. The danger for the life of the mother.
And we have a situation now where it’s in the states’ hands. And the states are going to be voting. The people are going to be voting. The last thing people want is for that to go back into the Federal government.
It was always fought, and very importantly, and people wanted it, they wanted it back in the states. Where it belongs legally and for a lot of other reasons.”
Jason Calacanis: “So you wouldn’t support a national ban?”
Trump: “No, I wouldn’t support a national ban. I would not.”
Harris has decried the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, as an attack on women’s reproductive rights. She has promised to reinstate the protections of Roe v. Wade via legislative action instead, but has been unable to clearly define what those protections should be:[xv]
Margaret Brennan, CBS Face the Nation: “On the issue of abortion. And rallying behind the idea of this federal law to restore what was upheld in Roe vs. Wade. But to do that, Democrats need sixty votes in the Senate. They need a majority in the House they don’t have. They need the presidency. The math doesn’t add up. So don’t you need to level with the American people and say this is not a realistic promise to make for 2024?”
Kamala Harris: “Congress has the ability to put back in place the rights that the Supreme Court took from the women of America.”
Brennan: “In theory. It doesn’t have the votes to do that.”
Harris: “That’s why we have elections. And that’s why we are seeing around this country that when this issue is on the ballot, from Kansas to California, people vote in favor of upholding basic freedoms. The vast majority of Americans agree that the government should not be making this decision for the women of America.”
Brennan: “What is it that you believe? I mean, what week of pregnancy should abortion access be cut off?”
Harris: “We need to restore the protections of Roe vs. Wade. We’re not trying to do something new.”
Brennan: “Well, that was a bit nebulous because it was about viability. Which could be anywhere from 20 to 24 weeks. And…”
Harris: “But…”
Brennan: “So…”
Harris: “No, no, no, no. No. Let, let, let me. Let me be very clear.”
Brennan: “That, that was in the Women’s Protection Act that the White House also endorsed.”
Harris: “Let me, let me be very clear. From day one, the president has been clear. I have been clear. We need to put back the protections that are in Roe v. Wade into law. The Supreme Court took it, Congress has the power and ability to pass legislation. To put those protections back in law, and Joe Biden will sign that bill. So, that is what we want.”
Brennan: “But, does it need to be specific in terms of defining where that guarantee goes up to? And where it does not? Which week of pregnancy?”
Harris: “We need to put back the protections of Roe vs. Wade.”
Brennan: “You know why I’m asking you this question, though. Because…”
Harris: “But, but, but... We’re not trying to do anything that did not exist before June of last year.”
Brennan: “Well, it wasn’t crafted into law. And that’s why I’m asking you for the specifics of it. Because Republicans say the lack of a precise date in cutting it off. You know this. They said that allows Democrats to perform abortions up until, you know, birth.”
Harris: “Which is ridiculous.”
Brennan: “Which is statistically not accurate.”
Harris: “Which is, which is, and it’s ridiculous.”
Brennan: “I understand that.”
Harris: “And it’s a mischaracterization of the point.”
Brennan: “So…”
Harris: “No, the point is…”
Brennan: “But, but do you need to be more precise?”
Harris: “The point is… I am being precise. We need to put into the law the protections of Roe v. Wade. And that is about going back to where we were before the Dobbs decision.”
Brennan: “But if, if there is the possibility through legislation. Any kind of protection. Like the Republican proposal of fifteen weeks protection. Is it worth doing something?”
Harris: “But members, members of the Republican party are also proposing a national ban. The thing that…”
Brennan: “I’m talking about the Lindsey Graham bill, as you know. And those proposals of giving some access, though that’s 15 weeks? Why do you think it shouldn’t be specific? You know, out in New Mexico, for example, the governor there says it shouldn’t be nailed down to a week. Because it should be a private matter between a mother and her doctor. There shouldn’t be a precise number put on that. Is that what you believe as well?”
Harris: “I believe that we should put the protections of Roe v. Wade into law. And the way that will happen is if we have a United States Congress, who regardless of their personal view for themselves and their family. Will agree that the women of America should be trusted to make decisions about their life and their body based on what they know to be in their best interest. It’s that simple.”
Even with that CBS stooge feeding her lines, Harris couldn’t come up with anything better than the hollow propaganda that she will “put the protections of Roe v. Wade” into law.
Here’s another fun, vacuous Kamala Harris statement where she casually mentions population reduction:[xvi]
Kamala Harris: “When we invest in clean energy, and electric vehicles. And reduce population. More of our children can breathe clean air and drink clean water.”
Weird. Another of Kamala Harris’s career highlights includes her suppression of the first amendment right to free speech and free press. In 2016, Kamala Harris abused her power as California’s Attorney General to persecute an investigative journalist who exposed Planned Parenthood’s involvement in fetal trafficking:[xvii]
David Daleiden, the Center for Medical Progress: “April 5, 2016. This is an idyllic Southern California spring day. As I’m walking out to take the kitchen garbage out, I turn around the corner and pass a big white, windowless van. All of a sudden, the door swings open and this tall, uniformed guy steps out. And he has a piece of paper in his hands, and he says, ‘Are you David Daleiden?’.
And he says, ‘I’m with the California Department of Justice. We have a search warrant for your home.’ And he hands me the warrant, and I think to myself, ‘Oh gosh. What’s going to happen next?’
So, about five or six California DoJ agents started stomping through my apartment. The other five of them standing on the lawn outside. Some of them were armed with AR-15s. Some of them had canine dogs with them. They had come for me.
In 2013, I began and orchestrated an almost three-year long, very in-depth, comprehensive investigative journalism study about the harvesting and trafficking of body parts from late-term abortions. There’s multiple violations and multiple issues that you very quickly start to learn about when you look into it. There’s the basic problem of selling body parts. Where you’re basically creating a system, creating transactions, creating business relationships that incentivize the objectivation and the destruction of human beings in order to keep the business going.
So, for about thirty months, we went undercover with the explicit purpose of partnering with some of the biggest Planned Parenthood abortion clinics in the country. To send their technicians and harvest body parts from the abortions that were being done that day, and then package up the parts and ship them off to different customers all around the country, sometimes around the world.
In July of 2015, we began to release the undercover video series. I had been hoping that this was something that would maybe generate 100,000 views or something. Instead, what happened was even bigger than I could have imagined. Within less than a week, we had close to three million views on YouTube of the first video. And multiple Congressional committees announcing that they were launching federal investigations of Planned Parenthood’s involvement in fetal trafficking and fetal experimentation.
The truth got out there. And the words of Planned Parenthood’s own leadership describing their organization’s participation in these activities went viral and was being publicized for the whole world to see.
Looking back on it, from the information that we know now, you know, I now know what was going on. Was that Kamala Harris, at the explicit instruction of Planned Parenthood, had targeted me, and me alone among all undercover video news gatherers in the state of California to enforce the California video recording law against me. And to punish me for speaking the truth about her powerful campaign donors at Planned Parenthood.
What we’ve come to learn in the years since. Just two weeks before serving the search warrant on my home, Kamala Harris had a secret meeting in Los Angelese with several top-level executives of Planned Parenthood in California.
We then found out from the California DoJ investigator reports, that Planned Parenthood’s top lawyer in California had specifically instructed the California DoJ agents that Planned Parenthood wanted the video equipment and the computers that I was using to publish the videos to be seized. In order to shut me up, in order to prevent me from continuing to publish the truth about Planned Parenthood’s involvement in fetal trafficking. And in order to punish me for speaking out with a message that was disfavored by Planned Parenthood and by Kamala Harris in the state of California.
I think what people have to understand about organizations like Planned Parenthood and about their political backers like Kamala Harris is that they’re shameless. And they will do whatever they have to do in order to promote their agenda. They’ll say whatever they have to say, and they are not afraid to use every bit of power at their disposal to force their agenda through.
Kamala Harris is the single greatest threat to first amendment civil liberties that our country has ever seen. If Kamala Harris is elected to be a heartbeat away from the highest office in the United States of America, you will have someone in the White House who has a radical contempt and disrespect for first amendment civil liberties. Someone who believes that she is entitled to use the powers of her office in order to punish the viewpoints of citizens who disagree with her.”
What can be. Unburdened by the first amendment to the United States Constitution.
Here’s a section of Daleiden’s investigative expose, including testimony from former Stem Express employee, Holly O’Donnell, and an undercover interview of Dr. Mary Gatter, President of Planned Parenthood’s Medical Directors’ Council:[xviii]
Holly O’Donnell: “My name is Holly O’Donnell. I’m twenty-four. And I’m a phlebotomist, and an ex-procurement technician. For those who don’t know what phlebotomist is, basically you draw blood for a living.
I was looking to help the public. I mean, I’m looking to make blood draws easy for children, for people. I’m very passionate about people. I found myself, I’m very humane and sensitive. I thought I was going to be just drawing blood, not procuring tissue from aborted fetuses.
I basically just went on Craigslist, typed in the word phlebotomist lab technician. And I clicked on a link to apply, it said procurement technician. I went to the website; it said Stem Express. And “Apply Now”, I applied. It was really short; it wasn’t even an application. It was your name, your phone number. That was it. And I got an email back, and I interviewed. And they don’t even let you know in the interview what you’re doing.
Stem Express is a company that hires procurement techs to draw blood and dissect dead fetuses. And sell the parts to researchers. They partner with Planned Parenthood, and they get part of the money. Because we pay them to use their facilities. They get paid from it. They do get some kind of benefit.
We were asked to procure certain tissues like brain, liver, thymus, pancreas, heart, lungs. And pretty much anything along, on the fetus. It’s basically trafficking of fetal tissues…”
O’Donnell: “They weren’t looking for a compassionate individual at all. They were just looking for someone who could get as much money, as many samples. I think that’s why they were interested in me as a phlebotomist, because I can draw quick. So, I think that they looked at that, and they wanted someone who could get the numbers up.
The owner, Cate Dyer, she used to be a procurement tech and then she went and started her own business. And now she’s making a lot of money based off of the poor girls, who half the time don’t even want to get abortions. It’s a pretty sick company.”
Undercover interviewer: “Okay, so I’d like. What, what would, what would you expect for intact tissue? What sort of compensation?”
Dr. Mary Gatter, President, Medical Directors’ Council, Planned Parenthood Federation of America: “Well, why don’t you start by telling me, what are you used to paying?”
Interviewer: “Okay. I don’t think so. I, I’d like you, I would like to know, what would make you happy? What would work for you?”
Dr. Gatter: “Well, you know in negotiations the person who throws out the figure first is at a loss, right? So, (laughs).”
Interviewer: “No, I don’t look at it that way. I know, you want to play that game. I get it. But…”
Dr. Gatter: “I don’t want to play games. I just don’t want to lowball because I’m used to low things from…”
Interviewer: “You know what? If you lowball, I’ll act pleasantly surprised, and you’ll know it’s a lowball.”
Gatter: “Okay.”
Interviewer: “What I want to know is, what would, what would work for you? Don’t lowball it. Tell me what you…”
Gatter: “$75 a specimen.”
O’Donnell: “For whatever we could procure, they would give a certain percentage. The main nurse was always trying to make sure that we got our specimens. No one else really cared, but the main nurse did. Because she knew that Planned Parenthood was getting compensated. So, she wanted to make sure that everything was going great for us, it was going great for them. And for us, it was going great for them.”
Interviewer: “And are we agreed that $100 would be, keep you happy?”
Gatter: “Well, let me agree to find out from other affiliates in California what they’re getting.”
Interviewer: “Yes.”
Gatter: “And if they’re getting substantially more, then we can discuss it then.”
Interviewer: “Yes.”
Gatter: “And if this in the ballpark, then that’s fine. And if it’s still low, then we can talk about it. Then we can bump it up. I want a Lamborghini.”
Interviewer: “What?”
Gatter: “I said I want a Lamborghini…”
O’Donnell: “Some of these women don’t know if they’re going to get an abortion. Some don’t even, they’re not 100% they’re going to get it done.
I didn’t know a lot about Dr. [Ron] Berman. Other than he worked for Planned Parenthood. There were actually comments made about, he had a reputation for going viciously fast. Like if we didn’t watch him, we would lose our specimens. It was that fast.
If there wasn’t a girl in the room, he would get mad. He would pace the hallways if there wasn’t something to do. Like, it’s like, it’s almost like he wanted to do it. And that sad - made me really concerned. And how fast he was going with these women. And I felt bad. Like, there was a few times to where he was working, and I had a girl who did not want to get it. But she, you know, she felt she had to. I wanted to tell her, do not go to this clinic.
What I imagine because I’ve seen abortions. I imagine him literally going into the room, lifting the covers, going in, grabbing and walking out. Like, that’s how fast it is, it’s ridiculous…”
O’Donnell: “The women I worked for were cold, cold. Just cold. They don’t care. They just wanted their money. They didn’t care that girls were throwing up in trash cans, crying. And even, there were times when patients would ask me. Like they would come in and be crying and be like, ‘Should I do this? Should I be doing this?’
And look, from my personal view, I’m very pro-life. And I would tell them, like, ‘Run, like, go. Like, you’ll figure something out. You don’t want to do this. Like, if you don’t want to do this, go home.’ And I would get in trouble for that.
I’d get in trouble. Jessica would say, ‘Why didn’t you consent her?’ Like, ‘Because she was crying and throwing up. And she didn’t even know if she wants to get it done.’
‘What did you say to her?’ ‘I told her if she didn’t, if she wasn’t comfortable with it, then I’m not going to do anything.’ She said, ‘Well, that, that was an opportunity you just missed.’
Like, I’m not going to, I’m just, I’m not going to, I’m not going to tell a girl to kill her baby so I can get money. And that’s what this company does. Straight up, that’s what this company does.”
In March of 2024, Kamala Harris made history as the first sitting president or vice president to visit an abortion clinic while in office, when she visited a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic.[xix] Oh, and her father, Donald Harris, was a professor of radical Marxist economic policy.
Exhibit 61[xx]
It’s almost enough to make you ask, does Kamala Harris value black lives? Or is she more concerned with the destruction of black nuclear families?
Finally, it’s worth reexamining the court case that granted the federal government the right to mandate abortion surgeries to the states. In 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 7-2 in Roe v. Wade that individual state laws banning abortion were unconstitutional.[xxi] The Court argued that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a fundamental “right to privacy”, which protects a pregnant woman’s right to an abortion.
Jane Roe, whose real name is Norma McCorvey, became pregnant in 1969 with her third child. McCorvey wanted an abortion but lived in Texas, where abortion was illegal except when necessary to save the mother’s life.[xxii] McCorvey ultimately did give birth and put her daughter, Shelley Lynn Thornton, up for adoption. During the pregnancy, McCorvey had been recruited by attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, who were looking for pregnant women seeking abortions.
The case took three years in the court system until the Supreme Court’s ruling in 1973. When McCorvey asked what was needed to be part of Weddington and Coffee’s lawsuit, she was told, “You’re white. You’re young, pregnant, and you want an abortion.”[xxiii] The lawyers asked if she thought abortion should be legal. McCorvey said she did not know. Weddington told her, "It's just a piece of tissue. You just missed your period."
McCorvey had initially tried to get a legal abortion by claiming her pregnancy was the result of gang-rape by a group of black men.[xxiv] But guess what? She was lying:[xxv]
Reporter, ABC News: “Jane Roe’s story was a terrible one. She said she had been gang-raped, gotten pregnant, was desperate to get an abortion. That’s what everyone believed as long as Jane Roe remained anonymous. When she went public, she told a different story.”
Reporter, Searching for Justice, PBS: “You weren’t raped while you were in Georgia?”
Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe: “No I wasn’t.”
PBS Reporter: “You were not?”
McCorvey: “No I wasn’t.”
PBS Reporter: “So all those stories that are in the books and so forth are not true?”
McCorvey: “Yes, yes sir. Yes.”
PBS Reporter: “They are not true?”
McCorvey: “Correct.”
ABC News Reporter: “And it turned out that lying wasn’t the only embarrassment this darling of the pro-choice forces presented. In her personal treatise published last year, Norma McCorvey told the story of her somewhat sordid life. Then, she still adamantly supported abortion. Now, she adds that to the list of sins she took with her into the Baptismal pool.”
McCorvey: “I’ve cheated people out of money. I’ve sold drugs. I, you know, I was an abusive alcoholic for, you know, many, many years. I’ve done a lot against his teachings. But I think the far greater sin that I did was to be the plaintiff in Roe vs. Wade.”
When it comes to political footballs, have any topics been used to divide the public more effectively than that of abortion? Where a court case in which a white woman lied about being gang-raped by a group of black men increased the power of the federal government, enabling it to mandate abortion clinics to the states?
Where vipers like Margaret Sanger, Norma McCorvey, Martin Luther King Jr. and Kamala Harris have distorted the abortion conversation, deceiving the public and facilitating the termination of tens of millions of unborn souls? Abortions that disproportionately target black communities?
Fooling us into thinking that abortion is about women’s reproductive rights vs. a patriarchal government led by conservative white men that want to repress women? When abortion has really always been about eugenics, organ harvesting, and child sacrifice?
If Marxist subversives have used propaganda and social engineering to distort the reality of abortion and to destroy black families, what other social movements have been used as their weapons of deception?
Black Lives Matter & Transgenderism
In 2013, three women formed an organization modeled on radical movements like the Black Panther Party of the 1960s and 1970s. Black Lives Matter (BLM) was formed by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi after George Zimmerman, a white man, was acquitted in the shooting death of African American teen Travyon Martin.[xxvi] The organizations seeks to highlight racism, discrimination, and racial inequality experienced by black people, to promote anti-racism, and to defend against police brutality and other racially motivated violence against black people by “defunding the police”.
The BLM movement expanded nationally in 2014 following the deaths of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and Eric Garner in New York City.[xxvii] Then, during the lockdowns of 2020, the organization’s influence expanded significantly after the death of George Floyd. Floyd’s death was officially declared a murder by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.
Exhibit 62[xxviii]
The Economist reported that between May 2020 and December 2020, BLM related causes raised donations of $10.6 billion.[xxix] After Floyd’s death, an estimated 15 to 26 million people participated in Black Lives Matter protests across the United States.[xxx]
But where did that money go? Has the movement strengthened the value of black lives? Were black communities and black-owned small businesses supported by these donations and the activism of the 2020 “Summer of Love”?
Investigative journalist Candace Owens released a documentary in 2022, The Greatest Lie Ever Sold, to explore these questions:[xxxi]
The Rise of BLM
Protesters chanting: “Black Lives Matter! Black Lives Matter! Black Lives Matter! Black Lives Matter! Black Lives Matter! Black Lives Matter!”
The organization was founded in 2013 by three female activists during the Trayvon Martin incident in 2012.
Candace Owens: “Where have you seen that money impacted throughout the city?”
Bob Kroll, Minneapolis Police Department: “Democratic politics. I meant that’s -”
Theresa Scott, former roommate of George Floyd: “We shared this place, right? And we went half on everything, you know? The rent, light, gas. So, what happened to Floyd, everything fell back on me and Alvin.”
Alvin Manago, former roommate of George Floyd: “The car out there is just sitting there. We couldn’t do nothing with it because we don’t have the title. They won’t take it or move it.”
Owens: “It is just shocking to me because of how much money was raised, to think that where he lives, the bills weren’t being covered.”
Owens: “So, Black Lives Matter released their 990 IRS filings. And of course, I wanted to jump right into it and find out exactly what happened to the approximate $80 million that was raised by them between July 1st of 2020 and June 30th of 2021.”
Owens: “Okay Vivek, so during the George Floyd death and the aftermath, you were in Silicon Valley. Is that correct?”
Vivek Ramaswamy: “Yeah, I was running a biotech company actually and I was CEO at the time. That’s right.”
Owens: “What was the corporate reaction in Silicon Valley?”
Ramaswamy: “It was a pledge of allegiance to one cause. To turn this man, who had died in a tragic death no doubt, into some type of new modern messiah figure. And I thought that the religious quality of every company bending the knee was a bit odd. And I was actually pretty keen on making sure that I didn’t lie to my employees. That I didn’t tell them something that I didn’t believe about this. I sent an employee all email, and I said, ‘Look, I understand there’s racial riots across the country, there’s unrest across the country. I hope everybody is safe. Let us know if you need us to support you.’ That was about it. And I remembered the reaction that I got. That somehow that failed to meet the moment because I didn’t recite the same ritual incantation that every other CEO was pledging allegiance to across the country. A corporate statement made by the same PR firm that effectively ended in Black Lives Matter.”
Owens: “Absolutely. And we’ve been, sort of, investigating throughout this documentary where did the money go that was given to Black Lives Matter. We never even really got the full answer of how much money was given.”
Ramaswamy: “I often say that BLM now stands for ‘buy lavish mansions’, because that’s what the BLM movement does. If you saw in recent weeks, there was a person effectively working for BLM, that personally purchased a mansion. She pays $3 million for it. Within days, like I think it’s 48 hours later, flips that to the BLM organization who pays nearly $6 million for that same house.
Booking a personal profit to the person who actually bought it. So that’s a self-dealing transaction that enriches personally somebody who is working for Black Lives Matter. Why is BLM buying big, lavish mansions in the first place?”
Owens: “When their donors were understandably outraged by the luxurious purchase, Patrisse Cullors [Co-Founder of BLM] came forth and also admitted that she hired both her mother and her brother to work at the property. What sort of work you ask? Well, Patrisse Cullors’ brother, Paul Cullors, is a graffiti artist by trade. That’s what he has done his entire life. He has done graffiti.
Patrisse instead hired her brother to do security for her. She paid Paul $840,000. That’s almost $1 million in just one year to her graffiti artist brother, his newly established security firm. Now, that makes for a great sister, but perhaps, she’s an even better baby mama. Because Patrisse also gave funding from Black Lives Matter to take care of the man who fathered her son.
His name is Damon Turner, and he received $970,000 from BLM to his company Trap Heals LLC, which purportedly provided live production and media. So that makes Patrisse a great sister, and a wonderful baby mama.
And also, by the way, she’s a fun mom. Because one of the events that Patrisse organized at her BLM mansion was for her young son’s birthday party. Nothing says taking on police brutality quite like hosting a birthday party for your young son in a Los Angeles mansion paid for by donors to the cause.
Patrisse likes parties, by the way, because she also threw a party there to celebrate the inauguration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. And, yeah that’s somewhat suspicious because what do Democrats have to do with Black Lives Matter? Think I’ll just leave that question open-ended.
Also suspicious is the fact that Black Lives Matter designated a whopping $8 million to an out-of-country grant. What? I thought this charity was about addressing police brutality in the United States? Apparently to do that, you need to send $8 million to Toronto, Canada. To an organization named M4BJ. They purchased a $6.3 million, 10,000 square foot downtown property in Toronto.
And I should also mention that M4BJ is run by Patrisse’s wife, Janaya Khan. Because it is! She is the Co-Founder, believe it or not. And here’s where it gets really interesting. Janaya Khan is gender non-conforming. These terms can be quite sensitive, so let me just use photos to illustrate my point. Janaya used to look like this, and now she looks like this.
Now that information would be entirely irrelevant if it wasn’t for the way that Patrisse Cullors saw it fit to spend the rest of Black Lives Matter’s money. Ready for some BLM pride? Well, according to their IRS form, $200,000 went to the Transgender Justice Funding Project. Another $200,000 went to the Transgender United Fund. Another $200,000 went to the Transgender Law Center. Another $200,000 went to Black Transgendered Media. Another $200,000 went to the Transgendered Variant and Intersex Justice Project. Another $200k went to The Transgendered District.
By the way, if you’re wondering what that is, it’s purportedly going to be the all transgendered district. And I guess that’s really, really important for Black America advancement in society. I guess, or whatever.
Another $200k went to The Saint James Infirmary. That organization, by the way, according to their website, is run by sex workers and is for them. Specifically, escorts, BDSM workers, strippers, peep show workers, phone sex operators, and web cam performers. It was actually the Saint James Infirmary that created the Transgendered District. So that’s just an organization within another organization, which by the way you see a lot of when you go through these documents. So yeah, there’s going to be, apparently, great big things involving sex workers in the future for Black America.
In continuation, The Center for Halsted received $200,000 from Black Lives Matter. They are Chicago’s community center dedicated to securing the health and wellbeing of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, and queer people of Chicago. Similarly, we have The Audre Lorde Project which received $200,000. And according to their website, they’re a lesbian, gay, bisexual, two-spirit, trans, and gender non-conforming people of color community organizing center.
Another $400,000 went to Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering, or TAKE, as it’s known for short. The founder of that organization is a transgendered individual by the name of Daroneshia Duncan Boyd. Daroneshia is also the Executive Director of the Transgendered United Fund, which I mentioned earlier. Which secured $200,000. So, a total $600,000 of BLM money went to a transgendered woman named Daroneshia Boyd who is operating two charities. I found that piece to be very interesting.
Here is Daroneshia describing in a 2020 interview how they were able to use that money that was received to her organization to purchase more real estate.”
Daroneshia Duncan Boyd: “We are opening up a new resource center here. And the resource center is almost three times as big as our last space that we was in. So, we have lots of space and lots of room for our clients to come in and enjoy.”
Owens: “I noticed that real estate seems to be a common theme amongst these transgendered organizations. Remember, there’s the first ever transgendered district. And there are also a couple of houses that are named on their IRS documents. For example, an additional $200,000 was given to the House of Tulip. According to their website, the House of Tulip provides zero-barrier housing to trans and gender non-conforming people.
But the one that really stood out as the most nonsensical is the $200,000 that went to the Griffin-Gracy Retreat and Educational Center. Known as House of GG for short. According to that website, they provide services and resources that positively impact the lives, history, and visibility of transgender, gender-questioning, and gender non-conforming persons. They admit that they purchased a property in Little Rock, Arkansas back in 2019. And that property was supposed to serve as an oasis and a retreat for transgendered persons. But, they admit, also on the website, that they actually never held such a retreat.
First, because their founder had a stroke and was recovering. And then it was COVID-19 so they still couldn’t host a retreat. And despite having never hosted a retreat at this amazing oasis property that they purchased, in 2021, they announced that they purchased a second property next door to the first one. So, yeah.
Now, all of the organizations that I just mentioned – none of them. Not one is up to date on filing a tax return with the IRS, which is required for charities. Because charities, remember, they don’t pay taxes. In other words, I’m not able to tell you how any of these transgendered organizations spent the money that BLM poured into their organizations during the 2020 and 2021 tax years.
If you continue to look through BLM IRS docs, you’ll notice that they gave millions of dollars to various Black Lives Matter organizations throughout America. Or at least at first glance, it appears that they did. A closer look you’ll see that they actually disbursed that funding to organizations that were “in care of” Black Lives Matter. This means that, actually, another organization is accepting the donation on behalf of BLM.
So, I decided to investigate that further and I noticed a really bizarre pattern. A lot of those organizations train activists. They train the youth to become activists in their communities. One organization even goes as far as bragging on their website about their history of getting arrested protesting. And they offer courses on various techniques like ‘bird dogging’ – that’s a technique that’s used to confront politicians.
I thought to myself, it’s interesting because I kept hearing over and over again while filming this documentary that people felt as though the protesters that arrived throughout these cities weren’t actually from the cities that they arrived in. They didn’t know where they had come from. Buses, there was this idea that buses were showing up filled with protesters. It’s a fair question then, is it plausible that Patrisse was giving money to groups that were creating protestors? Or training activists, rather. I mean why else would Patrisse give millions of dollars to so many trained activists?”
Weird. I wonder why that money didn’t go to black communities, and the activism didn’t focus on improving black lives? If I didn’t know better, I’d ask – was Black Lives Matter really about funding transgender organizations, buying lavish mansions, and radicalizing young Americans?
Also, here’s a quick trivia question for you. Which gender of child commands the highest price from human trafficking networks? Option a) boys, or option b) girls? Option c) transgender children, especially those who’ve had their genitals mutilated under the façade of “pediatric gender-affirming care”.
Elite human traffickers like George Soros – the vulture hedge fund oligarch known as “The Man who Broke the Bank of England” - also partner with corrupt NGOs and purchase real estate through these tax-free “charities”. They then use these properties – both above and below ground - to traffic and pimp out children and adults for rape, torture, murder, and Satanic, ritualistic abuse. Hmm.[xxxii]
By the way, did you know that even though BLM claims to be a “grassroots, decentralized, loose confederation of groups advocating for racial justice”, that it relies on a single “fiscal sponsor”, the Tides Foundation, to oversee the books of the over $10.6 billion donated to BLM-related causes?[xxxiii] Or that the Movement for Black Lives received a $33 million grant from Open Society Foundations in 2016 alongside additional grants from John Podesta’s Center for American Progress?[xxxiv] And that both the Tides Foundation and Open Society Foundations are NGOs funded and controlled by George Soros? Weird coincidence, right?
During 2020, the BLM-incited protests/riots did $1bn in damage to small businesses.[xxxv] In 2020, murders increased 37.9% in America’s cities.[xxxvi] The barrage of propaganda disseminated by BLM and their partners in the corporate media, meanwhile, seemed to support this trend towards violence. This trend towards instigating division between races, rather than towards unifying the country. Exhibit 64[xxxvii]
We saw similar tactics used by the Black Panther Party, as the nonviolent civil rights movement lost steam after MLK’s assassination, and the torch of revolution was transferred to the Panthers. Here’s a clip from the 2015 documentary Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution, a film which for some reason seems to idolize the Black Panthers, despite the evidence this organization was heavily involved in organized crime:[xxxviii]
Kathleen Cleaver, Black Panther Party & wife of Eldridge Cleaver: “Photographers took advantage. I mean, they took our pictures. They put them on newspapers. They put them on magazines. And that look that we projected. You know, the big Afro, the leather jacket, the shades, that became a hit. And obviously, photographers were drawn to the Panthers.”
Media montage: “Well we hear a great deal about the Black Panthers.” “Black Panthers.” “Black Panthers.” “The Black Panthers.”
Jim Dunbar, journalist: “The Black Panthers were absolutely unique.”
Media montage: “The Black Panthers.” “The Black Panthers.” “Black Panthers.” “The Black Panther Party.” “Black Panther movement.” “Black Panther Party.”
Dunbar: “I think the Black Panthers really understood the media. They knew what we were after. They knew what we were focusing on.”
Media montage: “The Panthers has amounted to…” “The Black Panther Party.” “Many people know of the Panthers.”
Dunbar: “You might say that we exploited the Black Panthers. But I think that there’s a lot of evidence that they used us to their advantage. They were able to establish their legitimacy as a voice of protest.”
John Lennon, The Beatles: “The Chairman of the Black Panther Party [Eldridge Cleaver]. And here he is.”
Reporter: “We have a film of your breakfast program. Is this without sound also?”
Eldridge Cleaver: “Uh, yeah.
Reporter: “Alright. Would you comment on this?”
E. Cleaver: “Yes. This is a free breakfast for children program, and they’re preparing food there early in the morning. It’s about two hours of work in the morning. These party members primarily set this whole program up, and then we get involved as many of the community people as we can.”
Man on video: “Who all wants tea? Pour more tea in, little brother. Come on in little sister, y’all can sit down and get something to eat...”
Jeff Hass, attorney: “Hoover saw any form of black organizing as a threat to the status quo as he saw it. Change that would have involved equality, that would have put power in black people’s hands was very much a threat to Hoover. He started something called COINTELPRO, directed against what he called black nationalist hate groups.”
M. Wesley Swearingen, FBI Agent: “COINTELPRO was the abbreviation of Counterintelligence Program.”
J. Edgar Hoover, FBI Director: “The purpose of this new counterintelligence endeavor is to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalists.”
Swearingen: “Neutralize could mean making somebody an informant. Op putting somebody in jail or having somebody killed. Hoover was sending letters to various offices almost on a weekly basis to come up with new ideas to go after members of the Black Panther Party.”
Hass: “245 of the 290 COINTELPRO actions were against the Black Panthers. One of the mandates was ‘Do not make this program public. Do not tell anybody that it exists’.”
Scott Brown, historian: “FBI has a memo that states the objective of counterintelligence operations. One is to prevent the rise of what they call the “black messiah”. A single charismatic leader that could unify the movement. They wanted to prevent the appeal of radical political movement to black youth. And they wanted to isolate these groups to prevent them from gaining respectability in the black community. And they were very explicit in stating these goals.”
Exhibit 65[xxxix] Exhibit 66[xl]
Ericka Huggins, Black Panther Party: “We were followed every day. We were harassed. Our phones were tapped. Our families were harassed. My parents were both visited by the FBI.”
Hoover: “We must create suspicion with respect to their respective spouses, and your imagination and resourcefulness must be employed in order of the Bureau to be successful.”
Landon Williams, Black Panther Party: “They would send letters to my wife, and the letters would say that Landon is sleeping with this woman, sleeping with that woman, or sleeping with the other women. Then when I got arrested, the FBI came to me and said, ‘Ha look. We’ve got all of this evidence. All of these people are going to flip and turn on you. We’re going to execute you, because we got you now. We’re going to execute you. But if you will be an informant for us, then we’ll let you go’.”
William O’Neil, FBI informant: “My recruitment by the FBI was very efficient, very simply really. I’d stolen a car and went joyriding over the state limit, and they had a potential case against me, and I was looking for an opportunity to work it out. And a couple of months later, that opportunity came when FBI agent, Roy Mitchell, asked me to go down to the local office of the Black Panther Party and try to gain membership.”
Beverly Gage, historian: “The FBI wanted to destroy the Panthers. They absolutely saw the Panthers as the vanguard of a very, very threatening and violent revolutionary movement. They absolutely wanted this organization to be destroyed…”
Emory Douglas, Black Panther Party: “It was Huey and Bobby’s idea to draw a pig drawing that would symbolize the police. So, the first pig I did was the one on the four hoofs. It just came to me one night, why don’t I stand it up on two hoofs? I’ll put a bandolier, a gun bandolier on with the holster and a badge and the flies around it. And that became the symbol - icon of the pig. It took on a life of its own.”
Crowd chanting: “Revolution has come. Off the pigs! Time to pick up the guns! Off the pigs! Revolution has come. Off the pigs!”
Ron McCarthy, Los Angeles Police Department: “That rhetoric didn’t bother us when it was spoken by the Panthers.”
College students chanting: “Power to the people. Off the pigs! Power to the people. Off the pigs!”
McCarthy: “But when it was picked up by college students, them saying it, that definitely bothered us.”
College students chanting: “Power to the people. Off the pigs! Off the pigs! Power to the people. Off the pigs! Power to the people. Off the pigs! Power to the people.”
Pat McKinley, Los Angeles Police Department: “I was a sergeant patrolling in the projects, and there was the cutest little girl. So, I stopped to say hello, and I said, ‘Hi honey, how are you doing today?’ And she looked at me and she said, ‘Fuck you pig.’ And I thought, we have lost it. Man, we have flat lost it.”
Howard Saffold, Chicago Police Department: “Anybody that criticized the police, especially when they didn’t have fear of saying it publicly made the police angry. It was us against them. That became the theme.”
Woman (on film): “We have seen the pig on the scene. We know what he’s like. We know what he’s capable of. Just being a damn pig. Oinking and beating and walking the street.”
E. Cleaver: “The police must be brought under control by any means necessary, including through force of arms. These racist, Gestapo pigs have to stop brutalizing our community. Or we’re going to take up guns and we’re going to drive them out.”
Clayborne Carson, historian: “That tendency to keep escalating the rhetoric – that was a major part of the growth of the party. But it was also a destructive force because you were always upping the ante.”
Black children singing: “I say guns, pick up the guns, pick up the guns and put the pigs on the run. Pick up the guns. Boom, boom. Guns, pick up the guns.”
Carson: “It brought all the repression down on them before they were prepared to handle it.”
Woman: “I just want to deal with black, and black liberation. My sin is picking up my damn gun. And I’m a mother – having my baby in one hand, my gun in the other. And then, I’m here motherfucker, to get what’s mine.”
April 4th, 1968
President Lyndon B. Johnson: “The voice that called for justice and brotherhood has been stilled. Men of all races now must join together in this hour to deny violence its victory, and to fulfill the vision of brotherhood.”
K. Cleaver: “The effect of the death of Martin Luther King on the Panthers was overwhelming. In that sense that once King was assassinated, and the way he was assassinated so publicly. It shattered many, many people.”
William Calhoun, Black Panther Party: “They’d killed their last chance for me to be peaceful with them. They’d killed their last chance for negotiation. They killed the man who walked through hell to try to get along with you. And you kill him? That was our champion. You killed whatever hope I had in you. And I had no more use for you. None.”
K. Cleaver: “I believe that there was a decision made that some response on the part of the Black Panther Party has to be made to what happened to King.”
Donna Murch, historian: “Eldridge Cleaver was worried that if the Panthers didn’t take decisive action, they would cease to be the vanguard. So, he had this idea of actually actively attacking the police. He goes and he approaches members of the party in Oakland, and all of the older people refused to participate. They knew that this would be suicide. But the youngest member of the party, little Bobby Hutton, decides to follow Eldridge into battle.”
Elbert “Big Man” Howard, Black Panther Party: “Little Bobby called me, ‘Big Man, I need a weapon.’ I gave him a Winchester 12-gauge pump shotgun that I had. And I told him, ‘Well, be careful out there. You know, watch yourself.’ And he said, ‘Okay, I will’. And he left. And the first thing in the morning, I had the radio on.”
Speaker: “The Oakland police stated that they were fired upon during a routine investigation into a suspicious person, and after a short search cornered Hutton and Eldridge Cleaver in the basement of a nearby house.”
K. Cleaver: “A tear gas cannister blew and the basement they were hiding in caught on fire. They decided they didn’t want to burn to death. They would rather surrender. Eldridge told Bobby Hutton to take off all of your clothes, so they can’t say you’re concealing a weapon. When you surrender, take off everything. But Bobby was embarrassed, and he just took off his shirt and he kept on his pants.”
Speaker: “Bobby Hutton came out with his hands in the air. First member who walked out of the house and was gunned down.”
“Big Man” Howard: “My heart sank. He was only 17 years old, and one of the first people to get killed in the party, and so young. In essence, I felt that I went out and got my little brother killed. What if I’d not given him the weapon? Those are some of the demons that were in my closet.”
K. Cleaver: “Shot down like a common animal, he died a warrior for black liberation. In the name of brotherhood and survival, remember Bobby.”
Marlon Brando, Hollywood actor: “That could have been my son lying there, and I’m going to do as much as I can. I’m going to start right now to inform white people of what they don’t know.”
K. Cleaver: “For the Black Panther Party, it was crisis and chaos because this was the first time that this had ever happened. There had been no Panther murdered by police.”
Huey Newton, Black Panther Party: “We want nonviolence, just like Martin Luther King. But nonviolence on the part of who? To sit and watch ourselves to be slaughtered like our brother? We must defend ourselves, as Malcolm X said, by any means necessary…”
Mark Kurlansyk, writer: “The Black Panthers were welcomed by all sorts of liberation movements. The North Vietnamese, who were moving into a newer embassy, gave their old embassy to the Panthers. And the Black Panthers, of course, loved being accepted like this.”
Yohoru Williams, historian: “In Eldridge Cleaver’s successful attempt to establish an international wing, he’s able to do some things that are very important. Malcolm X and other Black nationalists had talked about forging those types of alliances. The Panthers actually did it.”
N. Vietnamese interpreter: “We wish you victory in your struggle.”
E. Cleaver: “Thank you.”
N. Vietnamese interpreter: “And we hope to receive you in liberated Saigon.”
E. Cleaver: “And tell them that I hope to receive them in Washington D.C.”
K. Cleaver: “At that time, America was being demonized considerably because of the war in Vietnam. So, here we are, Black Americans who are opposed to all of this. We’re the counter to the United States. We were able to connect with North Koreans, with Vietnamese, with the Chinese, and with also many African liberation movements. And many people came to see us there.”
E. Cleaver: “We came over here to do what we can to communicate to you what’s happening in our struggle in the United States.”
Gage: “I think a lot of what draws these groups together is a kind of anti-American sentiment. If you want to really shake the American establishment, you want them to think that they are in danger. That a revolutionary new world is on its way. The Panthers are certainly the people you are going to support.”
E. Cleaver: “Since the United States of America is the backbone of oppression in the world, the blows that we strike against the empire there will also aid the liberation struggles in Africa, Asia, and Latin America as we aid ourselves.”
Now, here’re some other facts about the Black Panther Party you may find interesting. The Panthers promoted themselves as an organization founded in Marxist-Leninist ideology, also known as Communism.
The Party’s founders, Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale, raised money so that its members could purchase weapons, which they would then carry as they followed police looking for incidents of brutality.[xli] They raised this money by selling Mao Zedong’s “Little Red Book” and reselling them to Leftists and Liberals on the Berkely campus at three times the price. Every Party member also had to study Mao’s “Little Red Book” to advance his or her knowledge of the peoples' struggle and the revolutionary process. According to Bobby Seale, they would "sell the books, make the money, buy the guns, and go on the streets with the guns. We'll protect a mother, protect a brother, and protect the community from the racist cops."
As a reminder, Mao was the founder of the People’s Republic of China and chairman of the Chinese Communist Party. During his Marxist-inspired Cultural Revolution, tens of millions of innocent Chinese civilians were killed. This violent, internal revolution was spearheaded by young college students, whose soft heads had been indoctrinated by Communist propaganda. Real defender of democracy, Mao Zedong.
I started part two of this series with a clip from KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov, in which he detailed the process of Marxist-Leninist ideological subversion. This is a slow brainwashing process that always follows the same four steps: (1) demoralization, (2) destabilization, (3) crisis, and (4) normalization.
Now, is it possible that despite their different structures and approaches, that the leadership of the civil rights movement, the Black Panther Party, the Nation of Islam, Black Lives Matter, the CIA, & the FBI all have something extremely important in common? The objective of ideological subversion?
The following clip comes from Mikki Willis’ documentary, Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening, on the history of Marxist subversion in America:[xlii]
Mikki Willis: “In his Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx wrote ‘The theory of Communism may be summed up in a single sentence. Abolition of private property’. Karl Marx was a German philosopher and social theorist who lived in the 1800s. He is the co-author of The Communist Manifesto, which has been referred to as the bible of Communism. His theories of class conflict and dialectical materialism were instrumental in shaping Socialist and Communist movements worldwide. Josef Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong-Un, Hugo Chavez, Nicolás Maduro and many other Communist revolutionaries have cited Marxism as the foundation of their political ideologies.
Marx rejected all concepts of God, as well as the traditional family. According to members of his own family, Marx was emotionally, verbally, and physically abusive. His wife, Jenny, was plagued by depression which was compounded by Karl’s adulterous impulses and his inability to provide for his children. Despite his privileged upbringing and formal education, Karl Marx was often unwilling to work. And instead relied on the financial support of friends and family.”
G. Edward Griffin, investigative journalist: “In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all Communists in the United States. It read, ‘When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them as Fascist, or Nazi, or anti-Semitic. In the public minds, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will after enough repetition become fact in the public mind.”
Mainstream media montage: “The Founding Fathers were racist misogynists. Fascist. Fascist. Fascist political party. Radicals on the far right. Antisemitic. Antisemitic. Xenophobic. Transphobic. Uncle Toms. White supremacists. Domestic terrorists. Neo-Nazi organizers. Nazis. You are an anti-vaxxer. Anti-vaxxers. Racists. Racists. Racists.”
Voiceover: “Name calling is their number one bullying tactic. And they apply it unrelentingly. Anyone who questions their dogma or says something they find unacceptable or offensive.”
Griffin: “As early as 1928, the Communists declared that the racial differences among our people constituted the weakest and most vulnerable point within our social fabric. By constantly probing and straining at this one spot, they calculated that eventually the cloth could be torn apart. And that Americans could be divided, weakened, and perhaps even set against each other in open combat. They said in no unmistakable terms that the negro people, because of their social status, and their predominant working-class composition, offered greater revolutionary possibilities than any other cross-section of the population.”
BLM Protestors: “How do we get out of this mess? Revolution - nothing less! Revolution – nothing less! Revolution - nothing less! Revolution – nothing less! Revolution – nothing less!”
Griffin: “The Communists call not only for extensive chaos within the cities. The plan is for raging fires from one city to the next. The average American, they say, soft and decadent, when he sees billows of black smoke rising from one horizon to the other. When at night the only light he has to see by is the flickering red from flames leaping into the sky, he’ll become paralyzed with fear and panic. And do nothing to interfere with the guerilla bands as they strike at the community’s power centers.”
BLM Protestors: “Every city, every town. Burn the precinct to the ground!”
Griffin: “To justify violence, they have to be able to claim that they are liberating people. And if people are to be liberated, then it’s necessary to go through the motions at least of pretending that they have a right to form a nation of their own. The Communist party called for their liberation to break away from the United States and to setup their own nation within our borders.”
Media montage: “Activists now control barricaded areas. It’s been called an autonomous zone. They want it to be free of capitalism, state authority, and police.”
Griffin: “To take the United States, all of the United States, it’ll be necessary they say to involve white people as well as black. And in general, to escalate the revolution in America from race war to class war.”
Protestors: “Eat the rich and feed the poor. This is class war.”
Griffin: “Now, when they talk about pressure from above, they mean using their people and their influence within the very government marked for takeover. To bring forward official recommendations for legislation. The recommendations, of course, are offered supposedly as solutions to national problems. But when passed into law, their only real effect is to vastly increase the power of government and to move the country that much closer towards the ultimate goal.
The pressure from below, then, involves using their influence over the various mass membership organizations of the country to create the appearance of great popular support for these recommendations. Of course, the members of those organizations must never suspect that they are being used to promote the Communist program.
Now the silent majority, the average person, is caught right in the middle. He looks above and sees highly respected spokesmen for government calling for Socialist government. He looks below and sees mobs of demonstrators shouting for the same thing. He says to himself, ‘Has everyone gone crazy, or is it me?’ Now, he’s still in the majority of course, but he doesn’t know it. He thinks he is hopelessly outnumbered, and he bows to what he thinks is the democratic will of the majority.”
Zuby: “Here’s an interesting thing I’ve noticed is even with a lot of these ideologies, right? With what people call these days, you know, ‘woke’. If people were these horrible, awful, bigoted, racist, xenophobic, white supremacists, it wouldn’t even work. The only reason it even works is because people are so compassionate that they go like, ‘I want to make sure I use the right words, and I say the right phrases. So, you’re actually weaponizing the fact that people are decent people. And you’re taking that compassion and you’re targeting it at, oh this is the group of people who you should be angry at. They weaponized human compassion.”
Griffin: “We mustn’t kid ourselves into thinking that the Communists have placed their agitators only into the black communities. They’re working both sides of the street. They want hatred, violence, and bloodshed between the races. And they don’t care how they get it or whom they use. Even children if necessary.”
Kristina Wong, Radical Cram School: “My young comrades.”
Children: “Hi!”
Wong: “This is my way of finding out if you’ve been tainted by the patriarchy.”
Children: “Ooh. He looks creepy.”
Wong: “He looks creepy. Why?”
Child: “There’s just like this thing about white people that just makes me be like (eyeroll).”
Wong: “Oh, looks like Donny got a full cookie.”
Child: “Because he’s a white man.”
Puppet: “Say it with me.”
Children: “Structural racism. Yay!”
Griffin: “You may have wondered why the Communist party has been a staunch supporter of the drive to place a black studies curriculum into our high schools and colleges. The reason becomes obvious the minute you take a look at the textbooks and the study guides.”
Asra Nomani, CNN: “Schools are now radicalizing our kids. This is the volume of the book from Critical Race Theory. And it literally says here, ‘Whiteness is a bad deal, and it has a symbol of Satan.’”
Parent: “You’re going to deliberately teach kids, this black kid over here that they’re better than you because he white? You’re going to hurtfully tell a white kid, oh the black people are all down and oppressed? How do I have two medical degrees if I’m sitting here oppressed?”
Ajua Mason: “Not only is it in the schools, but it’s in the workplace. It’s throughout society. It’s destroying this country.”
Parent: “If this continues, we’ll look back and be responsible for the dismantling of the greatest country in the world by reverting to teaching hate and that race is a determining factor of where your destiny lies. Thank you.”
CNN Reporter: “Sarasota School Board Chairwoman, what has been the worst of what you’ve had to deal with in terms of community or parental reaction?”
Shirley Brown, Chairwoman: “The calling of names. Tyrant, Marxist, Communist. And they want to move kids over to charter schools and private schools without the oversight of the state. And that’s wrong.”
RT Reporter: “Education authorities in the United States are asking the government to use anti-terror laws and the FBI against parents who protest against the way their children are being taught.”
Congressman Josh Hawley: “It identifies no fewer than 13 possible Federal crimes, including making annoying phone calls. How about this one? They could be prosecuted for using the internet in a way that might cause emotional distress.”
Tucker Carlson: “Over the weekend, Democrats voted to ban gendered language in the House rules. That means no more terms like father, or mother.”
Ranking Member Smith: “Is the administration’s official policy to replace the term woman with birthing people?”
Media montage: “Black birthing people. Black birthing people. Black & indigenous birthing people.”
Senator James Lankford (R-OK): “You’ve shifted in places from using the term ‘mother’ to ‘birthing people’.”
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health & Human Services: “Again, we’re trying to be precise in the language that’s used.”
Lankford: “Mom is a pretty good word.”
TikTok Commentator: “I’m not a birthing person. I’m a mother.”
Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN): “Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?”
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown: “Can I provide a definition?”
Blackburn: “Yeah.”
Brown: “I can’t.”
Blackburn: “You can’t?”
Brown: “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.”
Blackburn: “The meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?”
Question: “Do you believe that men can become pregnant and have abortions?”
Aimee Arrambide: “Yes.”
TikTok Commentator: “Literally everything that was fought for for women’s rights is going straight down the drain.”
Rizza Islam: “This environment that has been created and corrupted and manipulated does not respect women. Does not respect children, does not respect men. It cares nothing for family. So, that’s why they have to attack mother and remove father. Because she’s going to protect that child, he’s going to protect that woman, and they’re both going to protect society.”
Brian Echevarria: “When you talk about a parent child relationship, you’re talking about something primal. That is in the heart of the Liberal, not the Marxist. That’s in the heart of the person that’s Conservative. And they’re pushing the boundaries on something that they cannot control.”
Epoch Times: “Washington state is on track to lawfully take gender dysphoric children away from parents who oppose transitioning treatment.”
Tricia Lindsay: “That is against the Constitution. The only time a parent loses their rights is if there’s an extreme circumstance.”
Vanessa “Gothix”: “It’s severing the bond between the parent and the child.”
Lindsay: “What they’re doing is they’re dividing families to take control of the children.”
“Gothix”: “The biggest defense against Communism is the nuclear family.”
Willis: “In chapter two of his Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx wrote, ‘Abolition of the nuclear family. The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course’.”
Parents: “We’re here to represent the millions of parents who disagree with the Black Lives Matter movement. If you go to Black Lives Matter website, it says that, ‘We disrupt the nuclear family.’ That’s my wife, this is our four children. Why would you disrupt the nuclear family?”
Griffin: “Because the real objective is to remove the family as a possible alternate source of guidance and support. All totalitarian regimes stive to destroy the close-knit family in order to remove any loyalties that might be higher than to the state itself.”
Mark McDonald: “I had seen over the years in my practice the steady decline in the expression of healthy masculinity and healthy femininity. The separation between the male and the female is almost complete now. And it’s due specifically to the ongoing attacks against masculinity and the degradation of femininity. If our family structure is lost in the next generation, what do we have left? We’re just a bunch of listless individuals living our lives out virtually behind a computer screen and following orders of the government.”
Patrisse Cullors, Co-Founder of Black Lives Matter: “Maybe it’s because I came into the movement at 17.5, so I have, like, just a knack for knowing how to organize young people. I was at the, our publication table today and I was speaking to this young person, and he grabbed the book, and he said, ‘It’s like Mao’s Red Book.’ And I was like, ‘Man that’s what I was thinking!’ And it was just really cool to hear him make that connection. And I was like, how about you buy 10 to 15 of these books, and you all have like a youth organizing group where you talk about it. And you really try to engage this. We need to build off of this.”
Cullors: “We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia in particular. We are trained Marxists.”
Alicia Garza, Co-Founder Black Lives Matter: “I do believe in Marxism. It’s a philosophy that I learned really early on in my organizing career.”
Reporter: “Investigations into the Black Lives Matter organization has revealed links to groups that are pro-Communist China.”
Reporter: “The self-proclaimed Marxist Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Alicia Garza also owns the Black Futures Lab Project. Yet all would be lost for the Black Future Lab if not for the Chinese Progressive Association. Donations for the Black Futures Lab don’t go to the foundation itself. The Chines Progressive Association gets them instead.”
Willis: “Through forensic investigations, we now know that the 2020 BLM ‘fiery but mostly peaceful protests’ were partially funded through a network of pro-Communist organizations. One of the groups is US-based Liberation Road, which was founded by a faction of the Communist Party of Vietnam. Liberation Road is allied with the New Communist Movement and has direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The San Francisco-based, Communist-rooted Chinese Progressive Association formed a sister organization called Asians for Black Lives, to serve as a bridge between BLM, and the Chinese Communist Party.”
President Joe Biden: “I spent a lot of time with President Xi. He is deadly earnest about becoming the most significant, consequential nation in the world.”
It’s time to unplug the bananas from our ears, to open up our eyes and to see. We have been under attack by a cabal of subversives for generations. Do you ever wonder why American history books drill the threat of far-right authoritarianism into us, specifically the Nazi regime? Yet they’re sparse on recording the far-left tactics of Marxist-Leninism that destroyed two of the largest, proudest empires in history in the 20th century? Through the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and the Maoist Revolution in China?
It’s because they’ve been using the exact same tactics here. Demoralization, destabilization, crisis, normalization. Demoralization, destabilization, crisis, normalization. They’ve irritated the worst of black vs. white race relations in their efforts to rip apart the fabric of America, but that is by no means their own leverage point of ideological subversion.
On January 10, 1963, the “Current Communist Goals” by Cleon Skousen was entered into the Congressional record, read by Democratic Congressman Syd Herlong, Jr. of Florida. I’ll go through all forty-five now, and I’d challenge you to find any that have not been actualized or significantly advanced by our present day:[xliii]
THE 45 COMMUNIST GOALS AS READ INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1963
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
3. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any Socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court.
Now, I want to highlight something G. Edward Griffin said in that clip from The Great Awakening. Griffin is an investigative journalist and the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island. Griffin has spent decades working to expose the threat of ideological subversion and the corruption of the Rothschild-controlled central banking system.
Griffin stated:[xliv]
“Now, when they talk about pressure from above, they mean using their people and their influence within the very government marked for takeover. To bring forward official recommendations for legislation. The recommendations, of course, are offered supposedly as solutions to national problems. But when passed into law, their only real effect is to vastly increase the power of government and to move the country that much closer towards the ultimate goal.
The pressure from below, then, involves using their influence over the various mass membership organizations of the country to create the appearance of great popular support for these recommendations. Of course, the members of those organizations must never suspect that they are being used to promote the Communist program.
Now the silent majority, the average person, is caught right in the middle. He looks above and sees highly respected spokesmen for government calling for Socialist government. He looks below and sees mobs of demonstrators shouting for the same thing. He says to himself, ‘Has everyone gone crazy, or is it me?’ Now, he’s still in the majority of course, but he doesn’t know it. He thinks he is hopelessly outnumbered, and he bows to what he thinks is the democratic will of the majority.”
This attack from above and from below highlights the depravity of the Communist conspiracy, and why its full extent has gone unrecognized by most for so long. The Deep State cabal has been radicalizing the global population to the far left, through the slow process of ideological subversion.
At the same time, they have been consolidating global governance and commerce by establishing corporatocracy, squeezing the public from the far right. Corporatocracy refers to the vast network of corporations, banks, colluding governments, media outlets, NGOs and the rich and powerful people tied to them. The cabal destroys the fabric of society from the bottom up by dividing and conquering, while in the chaos they consolidate industry & steal our wealth from above.
And that brings us to the FBI, the CIA, J. Edgar Hoover, & Allen Dulles. As Allen Dulles is the John Brennan of the 1960s, J. Edgar Hoover is the James Comey of the 1960s.
Earlier in this series, I mentioned that investigators who trace the history of “black operations” have discovered it’s nearly impossible to determine where organized crime ends and where intelligence operations begin. There is arguably no one in the world better at investigating the history of black ops than Whitey Webb. Webb wrote the two-part book series One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein.
Webb traces the merger of intelligence operations and organized crime back to Operation Underworld, a 1942 intelligence operation led by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and the OSS, the precursor to the CIA.[xlv] Operation Underworld involved the recruitment of high-level organized crime figures for work in American intelligence services, justified by war-time necessity. Mafia kingpins recruited into the program included Lucky Luciano and Meyer Lansky. These mobsters were used by their intelligence counterparts to cultivate intelligence with Italians in Sicily in advance of the Allies invasion of the island.
The leadership of the OSS, meanwhile, tended to go to the sons of the country’s wealthiest elites. Posts were held by members of the Mellon family of Pittsburgh, the family behind the Gulf Oil fortune.[xlvi] Heirs of the Morgan, DuPont, and Vanderbilt families also held leadership positions in the agency.
Nelson Rockefeller, meanwhile, headed his own intelligence agency, the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs, while his brother David Rockefeller also reportedly ran his own intelligence agency during the war. Nelson Rockefeller later became the unelected vice president of the United States for unelected president & Warren Commission member Gerald Ford, following Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974 over Watergate.[xlvii]
After the War, the ONI campaigned to have Luciano released from his prison sentence in exchange for deportation to Italy.[xlviii] His deportation was “the beginning of an effort to cement in place a powerful organized crime network that was transactional in scope and wedded to the American intelligence services.”[xlix] Luciano was deported alongside Frank Coppola, “the powerful Detroit mob boss who had been something of a mentor to Jimmy Hoffa, the mob-linked head of the Teamsters union… By the 1960s, Hoffa and the Teamsters were working closely alongside the CIA, particularly on efforts to assassinate Fidel Castro, who had seized many of the mob’s casinos during the Cuban revolution.”
Meyer Lansky also had ties to a mobster/bootlegger named Lewis Rosenstiel. Rosenstiel had impeccable timing, as he opened his Schenley Distillers Company in the wake of Prohibition’s repeal in 1933.[l] Now here’s where things get interesting. The following excerpts come from volume one of Webb’s book One Nation Under Blackmail, narrated by Grace Noble:[li]
Rosenstiel maintained his links to the criminal underworld long after publicly transitioning from bootlegger to businessman. Frequent dinner guests at Rosenstiel’s home in the years and decades after Prohibition included legendary figures of American organized crime, including Frank Costello, Sam Giancana, Santo Trafficante and Meyer Lansky. Lansky was known to address Rosenstiel as “Supreme Commander,” a name that Roy Cohn, Rosenstiel’s attorney and close friend, also used for the liquor baron…
The King of Bourbon and Blackmail
… Rosenstiel’s obsession with blackmail. Indeed, reports of Rosenstiel’s behavior at his company’s offices, as cited by Nicholas Faith, included Rosenstiel having placed “bugging devices” throughout his offices. Per Faith, he would treat his employees “like dirt, sacking them at a moment’s notice” and then go “to the toilet to leave them time to compromise themselves by talking in his absence.” Those employees were “compromised” as their conversations were recorded by the devices that Rosenstiel had strewn about the premises.
Additional assertions made in court and under oath by one of Rosenstiel’s ex-wives held that Rosenstiel had also placed microphones throughout his home in order to record conversations that took place at social events he hosted for the alleged purpose of obtaining potential blackmail against his guests. In addition, several sources reported to the 1971 New York State Legislative Committee on Crime that Rosenstiel’s Manhattan home had been “wired from roof to basement with hidden microphones, so that he could spy on visitors and staff.”
The system in Rosenstiel’s home had been installed by Fred Otash, an infamous private detective who had used electronic means to spy on the Kennedy family, Marilyn Monroe, and others. Otash later said that Rosenstiel’s home “was rigged to tape conversations for hours on end.” Otash had a penchant for blackmail himself, particularly sexual blackmail – he had once attempted to entrap John F. Kennedy using a call girl named “Sue Young” in the lead-up to the 1960 presidential election. As we’ll see shortly, Rosenstiel was also involved in a broader effort to obtain this variety of blackmail, which may explain why he had sought out the California-based Otash to bug his New York home.
Some of the sources that discuss Rosenstiel’s interest in blackmail also claim that Rosenstiel was bisexual. According to Nicholas Faith, discussions about Rosenstiel’s bisexuality among Schenley office employees were frequent enough for Rosenstiel to be referred to as “Rosie” around the office. Additional evidence for these claims later came from Rosenstiel’s fourth wife, Susan Kaufman.
Per Kaufman, whose previous marriage had collapsed because her first husband had been homosexual, she soon discovered that she had made a similar mistake in marrying Rosenstiel. Rosenstiel was reportedly un-interested in having sex with his new wife, but “went to great expense to have her dress up in clothes that made her look like a little girl.”
He would later be discovered in bed with one of his lawyers, Roy Cohn, and shrugged it off to his wife by asking for some more “alone time” with his attorney. Kaufman remembered responding, “I’ve never seen Governor [Thomas] Dewey in bed with you,” as Dewey was also one of his attorneys at the time, and she walked out.
Kaufman remembered the young Cohn, who was best known for his infamous stint as Joe McCarthy’s chief counsel during the height of the Red Scare, as flaunting his homosexuality whenever he was around Kaufman, openly caressing a former congressional associate in front of her and describing the homosexual antics of a close friend of his and Rosenstiel’s – Cardinal Spellman, one of the most powerful figures in the Catholic Church in North America. Cohn reportedly was so open with her because her first husband “had been gay and I must have understood because I’d stayed with him for nine years,” Kaufman later stated.
In 1958, Kaufman accompanied her husband Lewis Rosenstiel to a “party” hosted by Cohn at the Plaza Hotel in New York. Kaufman recalled entering through a side entrance and taking an elevator to the 2nd and or 3rd floor; her husband knew the way well enough that she “had the impression [he] had been there before.” The suite was one of the largest available at the hotel and it was “all done in light blue.” Inside the suite were Cohn and another figure closely associated with both Cohn and Rosenstiel: FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.
To Kaufman’s surprise, Hoover was wearing women’s clothes and wig, with Cohn introducing him as “Mary” in a bout of barely concealed laughter. “Mary” was also incidentally the nickname widely used among New York Catholic clergy for Cardinal Spellman, who was also alleged to attend other parties hosted by Cohn in the Plaza’s “blue suite.”
After being served a few drinks, Kaufman recalled seeing “a couple of boys come in, young blond boys. I’d say about eighteen or nineteen. And then Roy [Cohn] makes the signal we should go into the bedroom.” Sexual activities between the “young blond boys,” Cohn and Hoover ensued, with Kaufman declining to participate after being urged to do so by her then-husband. The Rosenstiels then left, leaving the boys alone with Cohn and Hoover. Cohn later laughed about the incident to Kaufman, saying that “Mary Hoover” attends his parties regularly and that he would make sure to “arrive at the Plaza first with his clothes [the female clothes allegedly used by Hoover at the parties] in a suitcase.” …
Additional evidence corroborating Kaufman as a witness came from two male witnesses who supported the astonishing allegations of Hoover’s habit of cross-dressing, with those witnesses having learned of the former FBI director’s habit at a different time and place than the events described by Kaufman. They also had no knowledge of Hoover and the “blue suite” parties in New York.
Exhibit 72.5
In addition, Kaufman told Anthony Summers that she possessed photographs showing Hoover in the company of Lewis Rosenstiel’s organized crime associates. Though Summers did not see these pictures personally, they were confirmed as authentic and had been seen by journalist Mary Nichols of the Philadelphia Enquirer. Nichols told Summers “She did have suitcases of photographs that she had hauled away from her marriage to Lewis Rosenstiel. The ones I saw showed Hoover, lawyer Roy Cohn and Rosenstiel, at all sorts of social events with mobsters.”
There is also evidence that, not only did these parties at the Plaza hotel take place, but that they were used to obtain sexual blackmail, with Kaufman asserting that her husband possessed pictures of Hoover wearing women’s clothes and that those images had been passed to Rosenstiel’s associate, mobster Meyer Lansky. Journalist and author Anthony Summers has noted that, given Rosenstiel’s interest and ability to have his residences and businesses bugged, “[Rosenstiel] was quite capable of having the sex sessions at the Plaza bugged or arranging for Edgar to be photographed in his female costumes.”
In addition, New York attorney John Klotz, tasked with investigating Roy Cohn for a case well after Kaufman’s testimony, independently found evidence of the “blue suite” at the Plaza Hotel and its role in a sex extortion ring after combing through local government documents and information gathered by private detectives. It allegedly involved minors as well as young men aged eighteen and older. Klotz later summarized his findings, telling journalist and author Burton Hersh: ‘Roy Cohn was providing protection. There were a bunch of pedophiles involved. That’s where Cohn got his power from – blackmail.’
Further confirmation of Rosenstiel’s and Cohn’s activities in the “blue suite,” later determined to be Suite 233, comes from statements made by Cohn himself to former NYPD detective and ex-head of the department’s Human-Trafficking and Vice-Related Crimes Division, James Rothstein. Rothstein later told John DeCamp – a former Nebraska state senator who investigated the Franklin scandal of the 1980s – that Cohn had admitted to being part of a sexual blackmail operation targeting politicians with minors during a sit-down interview with the former detective.
Rothstein told DeCamp the following about Cohn: ‘Cohn’s job was to run the little boys. Say you had an admiral, a general, a congressman, who did not want to go along with the program. Cohn’s job was to set them up, then they would go along. Cohn told me that himself.’
Rothstein later told Paul David Collins, a former journalist turned researcher, that Cohn had also identified this sexual blackmail operation as being part of the anti-communist crusade of the time.
The fact that Cohn, per Rothstein’s recollection, stated that this sex blackmail ring was part of the anti-communist crusade coupled with Hoover’s involvement in these “blue suite” events suggests that elements of the government, including Hoover’s FBI, may have been connected at a much broader level to the operation in a way that transcended Hoover’s own personal involvement.
Rothstein confirmed his statements to both DeCamp and Collins in an interview with me that was conducted in early 2020. He additionally told me that Cohn had told him that his role in this ring had originally come about because he himself had been entrapped and blackmailed, leading Rothstein to feel some sort of sympathy for Cohn.
For those that may find it hard to believe that such an operation would take place with the involvement of the FBI director, there are also other, related allegations to consider – that American intelligence operatives and organized crime had competed and then collaborated to blackmail Hoover years before Kaufman witnessed these events at the Plaza hotel beginning in 1958.
Lansky was credited with obtaining compromising photos of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover sometime in the 1940s, which showed “Hoover in some kind of gay situation,” according to a former Lansky associate, who also said that Lansky had often said of Hoover, “I fixed that sonofabitch.” Meyer Lansky’s widow also later claimed that her husband had acquired “hard proof of Hoover’s homosexuality and used it to neutralize the FBI as a threat to his own operations.”
The photos showed Hoover engaged in sexual activity, specifically oral sex, with his long-time friend, FBI Deputy Director Clyde Tolson. There is considerable, separate evidence from the period that the close, professional relationship between Hoover and Tolson was also intimate and that this was an “open secret” in Washington.
At some point, these photos fell into the hands of CIA counterintelligence chief James J. Angleton, who later showed the photos to several other CIA officials, including John Weitz and Gordon Novel. Both Weitz and Novel later stated that the pictures they had seen showed Hoover engaged in oral sex on a man who Angleton identified as Tolson; however, only Hoover’s face was recognizable in the photographs. Angleton also claimed that the photos had been taken in 1946. Angleton was in charge of the CIA’s relationship with the FBI as well as Israeli intelligence until he left the agency in 1972. Angleton was also a CIA figure who had pushed for the Agency to forge ties with Meyer Lansky, raising the possibility that Angleton could have received the photo from Lansky.
However, Anthony Summers, in Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover, has argued that it was not Lansky, but William Donovan, the director of the OSS, who obtained the original photos of Hoover and either he, or another person at the OSS or early CIA, had later shared them with Lansky. Summers also states that “To [gangster Frank] Costello and Lansky, the ability to corrupt politicians, policemen and judges was fundamental to Mafia operations. The way they found to deal with Hoover, according to several mob sources, involved his homo-sexuality.”
With the mobster associates of Rosenstiel being under significantly more pressure during the 1950s, in large part thanks to the Kefauver Committee, it’s possible that Hoover’s appearances at The Plaza Hotel may have served as additional “insurance” for these interests.
Hoover, for his part, was likely already used to the realities of being blackmailed by this point, given that his private sex life had been known to the mob and US intelligence community for years. He likely saw the opportunity to partake in the scheme as a means of amassing his own, massive collection of blackmail. With thick dossiers on friend and foe alike, Hoover’s office contained “secret files” on numerous powerful people in Washington and beyond, files he used to gain favors and protect his status as FBI director for as long as he wished. Even former OSS veterans like Richard Helms have made such claims, alleging that Hoover “played ‘a very skillful game’ with knowledge of the sexual habits of prominent people.”
Further evidence for this comes from journalist and author Burton Hersh who alleges in his book Bobby and J. Edgar: The Historic Face-Off Between the Kennedys and J. Edgar Hoover That Transformed America that Hoover had also been tied to Sherman Kaminsky, who helped run a sexual blackmail operation in New York that involved young male prostitutes. Kaminsky claimed to have been New York-bred, but federal investigators later stated he was originally from Baltimore. Some reports claim Kaminsky had ties to Israel, having served in the Israel Defense Forces.
The ring, which was called “The Chickens and the Bulls” by the NYPD, targeted prominent men who were closeted homosexuals throughout the United States, many of them married with families. Among those who had been blackmailed were a Navy admiral, two generals, a US congressman, a prominent surgeon, an Ivy League professor and well-known actors and television personalities.
That operation was busted and investigated in a 1966 extortion probe led by Manhattan District Attorney Frank Hogan, though the FBI quickly took over the investigation and photos showing Hoover and Kaminsky together soon disappeared from the case file. Kaminsky successfully avoided arrest for 11 years, having “disappeared” from a New York courthouse undetected during his sentencing hearing.
Why would Hoover have been involved with the activities of Kaminsky? There are only a few possibilities. One possibility is that Hoover had been blackmailed by Kaminsky, though it’s more likely that Kaminsky instead had ties to figures in organized crime that had already blackmailed Hoover long before. Another possibility is that Hoover was cozy to a second sexual blackmail operation targeting closeted homosexual men because he sought to pad his own library of blackmail for personal and professional gain.
What does seem clear is that Hoover was well aware of the power that amassing blackmail afforded and was willing to indulge in taboo behavior at the “blue suite” because he was no longer concerned about being extorted or manipulated with sexual blackmail in ways that would end his career or destroy his public image. He had fallen in with the very crowd that had reportedly blackmailed him, later developing a symbiotic relationship with that same network.
The most obvious, and troubling, symptom of this symbiosis was Hoover’s reluctance to tackle organized crime as FBI director. Hoover repeatedly declined to use the Bureau to target organized crime networks, referring to organized crime as a “local” problem in which the FBI did not need to intervene for most of his nearly fifty-year stint as the top law enforcement administrator in the country.
According to congressional crime consultant Ralph Salerno, Hoover’s apparent aversion to targeting organized crime networks, such as those in which Rosenstiel and Lansky figured prominently, “allowed organized crime to grow very strong in economic and political terms, so that it became a much bigger threat to the wellbeing of this country than it would have been if it had been addressed much sooner.” …
Such blackmail was not only wielded by organized crime interests to protect their rackets from FBI meddling, but also by American intelligence agencies. According to David Talbot in The Devil’s Chessboard, McCarthy’s efforts to target CIA analyst and CIA director Allen Dulles’ ally William McBundy in mid-1953 led Dulles to put the squeeze on Hoover, who (despite having expressed doubts about [Joseph] McCarthy’s campaign at this time) continued to feed the Wisconsin senator and Roy Cohn “a stream of damaging information on his [Hoover’s] Washington enemies.”
Dulles, himself the subject of a thick dossier kept in Hoover’s office that documented his adulterous trysts, made sure the CIA maintained the blackmail on Hoover, including that which had been shared between OSS veterans, most likely James Jesus Angleton, and Meyer Lansky years earlier.
As Talbot notes, “The CIA counterintelligence chief [J. J. Angleton] was rumored to occasionally show off photographic evidence of Hoover’s intimate relationship with FBI deputy Clyde Tolson, including a photo of Hoover orally pleasuring his longtime aide and companion,” while one of Allen Dulles’ mistresses was known to refer to Hoover as “the Virgin Mary in pants.” …
Vendetta Begets Vendetta
One of the many things that Roy Cohn and J. Edgar Hoover shared was having Robert Kennedy as an enemy. Hoover not only subverted the Kennedy-led effort to “get” Roy Cohn by passing Cohn the government’s case against him on at least one occasion, he also looked for ways to bring Kennedy down. This was not motivated by Kennedy’s efforts to indict Cohn but instead by his efforts as Attorney General to rein in Hoover and bring down the organized crime networks that had first blackmailed Hoover and later formed an “unsavory alliance” with him. According to von Hoffman, regarding Hoover’s strategy:
‘Hurting Kennedy demanded some ingenuity, for the target was clean on money, far cleaner on sex than his brother, in short not an easy one to bring down. One approach might be to embarrass him with his liberal constituency, to depict him as a ruthless Attorney General indifferent to the Bill of Rights and individual liberty. To put the plan into effect, Roy was needed as a membrane of protection for the Director; others were needed, including Congressman Gallagher who was making a reputation for himself in the House as a civil libertarian, a legislator committed to preventing the government from turning itself, by aid of computers, lie detectors and advanced electronics, into a free-world version of Big Brother.’ …
[Meyer] Lansky had by the 1930s acquired compromising evidence of Hoover’s homosexual activities. In the 1950s, Meyer Lansky, and other mob figures such as Sam Giancana, supplied women to John F. Kennedy, some of whom were logged into Hoover’s growing files of dirt on the young senator. In the 1960s this deep political equilibrium was threatened by Robert Kennedy’s war on organized crime, which alienated Hoover. Feeling increasingly threatened, especially after the Kennedys began to collect their own files on Hoover, both Hoover and the mob began to escalate their collection of Kennedy sexual dirt. At first Hoover gained White House influence by protecting the Kennedys against mob blackmail, but in 1963 Hoover, desperate, began to leak some of his own dirt on Kennedy to the public.
Hoover’s sexual dirt on the Kennedys began to surface in late June 1963, after the President’s “peace speech” at American University with its appeal, “Let us reexamine our attitude toward the Cold War.”
The same cabal that infiltrated the leaders of the civil rights & militant black movements, agitating the worst in race relations, has also been blackmailing and corrupting leaders of government and intelligence agencies for centuries.
J. Edgar Hoover & the FBI used COINTELPRO to illegally surveil and infiltrate political organizations that the FBI perceived as subversive. The hard truth is that many of the organizations and leaders they targeted were in fact subversives working to destroy the fabric of society.
Unfortunately, so was J. Edgar Hoover. The objective was never to bring down these criminal organizations to protect Americans. The objective was to further militarize and radicalize these organizations, sowing the seeds of a future race war alongside the long, slow brainwashing process of ideological subversion.
The race riots incited in 1968 following the assassinations of MLK Jr. and RFK led directly to the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, which Richard Nixon and his successors used to criminalize black and brown men for decades. In doing so, they destroyed black nuclear families, eviscerating their ability to own private property.
We’ll return to the history of race relations in the post-civil rights era in the next episode, part five of this series. In that episode, we begin by exploring the grandfather of conspiracies: who assassinated President John F. Kennedy?
Exhibit 73[lii]
[i] “Vince Everett Ellison on how the civil rights movement destroyed black America.” @TuckerCarlson. X. June 13, 2024. Accessed June 27, 2024. https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1801302722664087612
[ii] “Martin Luther King, Pete Seeger, Charis Horton, Rosa Parks, and Ralph Abernathy at Highlander in 1957”. Reddit. r/OldSchoolCool. 2016. Accessed July 20, 2024. https://www.reddit.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/5n2bc0/martin_luther_king_pete_seeger_charis_horton_rosa/
[iii] “Rosa Parks.” Sequachee Valley Electric Cooperative. August 31, 1957. Accessed July 20, 2024. https://www.svalleyec.com/rosa-parks
[iv] “Rosa Parks Papers: Subject File, 1937-2005; Highlander Folk School, Monteagle, Tenn.”. Library of Congress. Labor Day Weekend, 1957. Accessed July 20, 2024. https://www.loc.gov/resource/mss85943.001415/?sp=13&r=-0.322,0.06,1.738,1.038,0
[v] Ellison, Vince Everett (dir.) Will You Go To Hell For Me? April 26, 2023. Accessed June 27, 2024. https://watch.salemnow.com/series/vaU9xMm4irfg-will-you-go-to-hell-for-me
[vi] Ellison, Vince Everett. The Iron Triangle: How Democrats are using race to divide America in their quest for power. And how we can stop them. Outskirts Press Inc., 2020.
[vii] King, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. “Family Planning - A Special and Urgent Concern”. Planned Parenthood. 1966. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://perma.cc/7TV2-22L5
[viii] Sanger, Margaret. “Letter from Margaret Sanger to Dr. C.J. Gamble”. Genius. December 10, 1939. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://genius.com/Margaret-sanger-letter-from-margaret-sanger-to-dr-cj-gamble-annotated
[ix] King, Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. “Family Planning - A Special and Urgent Concern”. Planned Parenthood. 1966. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://perma.cc/7TV2-22L5
[x] “Most U.S. Planned Parenthoods located in minority communities: report”. Life Site News. September 19, 2011. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/most-us-planned-parenthoods-located-in-minority-communities-report/
[xi] Crutcher, Mark, Carole Novielli & Renee Hobbs. “Racial Targeting and Population Control”. Life Dynamics Incorporated. 2011. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20131026163022/http://prolifeamerica.com/Racial-Targeting-Population-Control.pdf
[xii] Hoye, Walter II. “ABORTION IS THE BIGGEST SINGLE NEGATIVE FORCE ON BLACK AMERICAN GROWTH”. Urban Cure. April 30, 2018. Accessed July 15, 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20190816172739/https://www.urbancure.org/blog/post/abortion-is-the-biggest-single-negative-force-on-black-american-growth
[xiii] Kennedy, Robert F., Jr. The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. Children’s Health Defense, New York: 2021.
[xiv] @hodgetwins. “The left keeps lying and saying Trump wants to ban abortion”. X. July 23, 2024. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://x.com/hodgetwins/status/1815880973852029298
[xv] @LifeNewsHQ. “Kamala Harris Can’t Name a Single Abortion Limit She Supports”. X. July 23, 2024. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://x.com/LifeNewsHQ/status/1815870577778823438
[xvi] @TaraBull808 “Did you hear that? Listen again.“ X. July 22, 2024. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://x.com/TaraBull808/status/1815378765490671715
[xvii] @FreyjaTarte. “David Daleiden Exposes Human Body Parts Selling & Censored by Planned Parenthood and Kamala Harris.”. X. July 23, 2024. Accessed August 1, 2024.
[xviii] @RedpillDrifter. “HUMAN CAPITAL | PLANNED PARENTHOOD BLACK MARKET FOR BABY PARTS”. X. March 29, 2024. Accessed July 31, 2024. https://x.com/RedpillDrifter/status/1773811569245495704
[xix] Pitofsky, Marina, Michael Collins, Savannah Kuchar, Brianne Pfannestiel, Rachel Barber and Sudiksha Kochi. “Kamala Harris' visit to Minnesota Planned Parenthood spotlights abortion: Recap”. USA Today. March 14, 2024. Accessed August 1, 2024.https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/03/14/kamala-harris-planned-parenthood-abortion-minnesota-live-updates/72970652007/
[xx] @liz_churchill10. “Kamala Harris needs to admit her Father was a Marxist Professor.” X. July 23, 2024. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1815962840538267805
[xxi] “Roe v. Wade”. Wikipedia. July 30, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
[xxii] Ibid
[xxiii] Ibid
[xxiv] Looper, Shane. “Looper column: ‘AKA Jane Roe’: The Norma McCorvey story”. Foster’s Daily Democrat. May 22, 2020. Accessed July 30, 2024. https://www.fosters.com/story/lifestyle/faith/2020/05/22/looper-column-aka-jane-roe-norma-mccorvey-story/1165034007/
[xxv] @MJTruthUltra. “This is a reminder that Roe v Wade surrounded a lady named Norma McCorvey aka Jane Row who lied about being “gang-r*ped”. X. March 29, 2024. Accessed July 30, 2024. https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1805306608185978898
[xxvi] “Black Lives Matter”. Wikipedia. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter
[xxvii] Ibid
[xxviii] Ibid
[xxix] “Six months after mass protests began, what is the future of BLM?”. The Economist. December 10, 2020. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/12/10/six-months-after-mass-protests-began-what-is-the-future-of-blm
[xxx] “Black Lives Matter”. Wikipedia. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter
[xxxi] Owens, Candace (dir.). The Greatest Lie Ever Sold. 2022. Accessed June 28, 2024. https://www.dailywire.com/videos/the-greatest-lie-ever-sold
[xxxii] See Just the Tip for more information.
[xxxiii] “Six months after mass protests began, what is the future of BLM?”. The Economist. December 10, 2020. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://www.economist.com/united-states/2020/12/10/six-months-after-mass-protests-began-what-is-the-future-of-blm
[xxxiv] Richardson, Valerie. “Black Lives Matter cashes in with $100 million from liberal foundations”. The Washington Times. August 16, 2016. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun/
[xxxv] Owens, Candace (dir.). The Greatest Lie Ever Sold. 2022. Accessed June 28, 2024. https://www.dailywire.com/videos/the-greatest-lie-ever-sold
[xxxvi] @Steve_Sailer. “Libertarians often blame America's high murder rate on drug laws.” X. January 9, 2021. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://x.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1348159211931279362
[xxxvii] @Steve_Sailer. “Libertarians often blame America's high murder rate on drug laws. In 2020, though, drug laws were either repealed or not enforced much due to covid, BLM, defund the police, etc.”. X. January 9, 2021. Accessed August 12, 2024. https://x.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1348159211931279362
[xxxviii] Nelson Jr., Stanley (dir.). Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution. YouTube Movies. 2015. Accessed July 13, 2024.
[xxxix] “COUNTERINTELLIGENCE PROGRAM BLACK NATIONALIST - HATE GROUPS RACIAL INTELLIGENCE 3/4/68”. Genius. March 4, 1968. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://genius.com/Us-federal-bureau-of-investigation-cointelpro-long-range-goals-and-prevention-of-a-black-messiah-annotated
[xl] “The Black Panthers Viewed by Hoover as National Threat.” The New York Times. July 16, 1969. Accessed July 14, 2024. http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/White%20Materials/White%20Assassination%20Clippings%20Folders/Security%20Folders/Security-Hoover/Item%20183.pdf
[xli] “Black Panther Party”. Wikipedia. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party
[xlii] Willis, Mikki (dir.). “Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening (Full, Unedited Movie)”. The Great Awakening. 2023. Accessed June 28, 2024. https://rumble.com/v2s0gp8-plandemic-3-the-great-awakening-full-unedited-movie.html
[xliii] “THE 45 COMMUNIST GOALS AS READ INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1963”. Congressional Record. January 10, 1963. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://cdn.subsplash.com/documents/W8FD27/_source/5b8c9068-5344-4a33-b77a-31d54f98a52e/document.pdf
[xliv] Willis, Mikki (dir.). “Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening (Full, Unedited Movie)”. The Great Awakening. 2023. Accessed June 28, 2024. https://rumble.com/v2s0gp8-plandemic-3-the-great-awakening-full-unedited-movie.html
[xlv] Webb, Whitney. One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. Waterville, Oregon: Trine Day LLC, 2023.
[xlvi] Ibid
[xlvii] “Nelson Rockefeller”. Wikipedia. Accessed July 18, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Rockefeller
[xlviii] Webb, Whitney. One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. Waterville, Oregon: Trine Day LLC, 2023.
[xlix] Ibid
[l] Ibid
[li] Webb, Whitney. One Nation Under Blackmail - Vol. 1: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. Audiobook: narrated by Grace Noble. Waterville, Oregon: Trine Day LLC, 2023.
[lii] “COINTELPRO Black Extremist Part 01 of 23”. FBI. August 25, 1967. Accessed July 14, 2024. https://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro/cointel-pro-black-extremists/cointelpro-black-extremists-part-01-of/view